Pets have to go?,

It is a topic that is near and dear to many people, but one that I find often ignored in conversations of sustainability and environmental responsibility.

Should Rover go?

The amount of natural resources used to feed, water, tend, and accomodate our domesticated pets is staggering. This combined with the toxic nature of cat litter, dog feces, and aquarium carbon filters makes me wonder if we shouldn't start curbing our companion habits.

When looking at the balance sheet, aren't pets really a luxury item that should fall into the jet-ski and hot tub sector of environmental priorities?

4 replies

Wny are pets considered lesser beings than people? We have to get over this speciesism. We and Rover are the same thing but in different shapes.

Animals are equals on this planet. Why not get rid of all the kids? They use up all the resources, and won't make bitchy replies to blog post questions.

Pets are not a luxury item. They are family members. They are, as one writer put it, "the keepers of our souls".

More wasteful things that serve no purpose that should go should be some sporting events like car racing that use a lot of land and resources or things like that, IMHO (for what it's worth).

Great question, though!

Written in July 2008

"They use up all the resources, and won't make bitchy replies to blog post questions."

Actually, that should have been:

"Kids use up a lot of resources and then go on to make bitchy replies to blog post questions."

Written in July 2008

"I love cats and dogs, but think the responsible approach is to neuter all animals that are not working animals (i.e. seeing eye dogs, farm dogs and cats etc.), and maintain a small and highly regulated breeder population of non-native species for these purposes."

Wow. Well said (and not just 'cause I agree). Pets can come in all kinds of species, not just dogs and cats, but it does depend on where you live, especially if feral cats or dogs aren't native to your area to begin with.

For the record (or CD) my pets are neutered and I'm hoping my resuced goldfish will never figure out how to breed. :-0

Written in July 2008

Harald K. 35°

I think pets should be seen as a luxury, but not necessarily a wasteful one. Yes, when you add up all we use to feed them and care for them, it seems a lot, but we shouldn't just look at the big bad sum. We should look at the "return on investment" of whatever we want out of Rover.

For some people, the value of a companion may be a sensible use of their "environmental allotment", their fair share of the earth's resources. But probably not for most of us, or even most people who keep pets today. I do think it is a concern that should be taken into account for everyone who gets a pet.

Written in August 2008

Featured Companies & Orgs 

Pledge to do these related actions

Find (and lower) your carbon footprint, 179°

Inevitably, in going about our daily lives, each of us contributes to the greenhouse gas ...

Switch to natural cleaning products and get rid of household chemicals!, 597°

Out at the Homestead we have made the switch to environmentally friendly cleaning products. Baking ...

Synthetic Oils, 11°

With advanced SYNTHETIC LUBRICANTS in your car's engine AND transmission you will improve its fuel-efficiency ...

Follow these related projects

Guzzled.org

Baltimore, United States

Queen Charlotte Wilderness Park

Marlborough, New Zealand