The Watercone: One Serving Per Day, No Pumps, Filters or Batteries Required

Jeanne Roberts

According to the 2nd UN World Water Development Report, one fifth of the world's population lacks access to safe drinking water. That's more than a billion people, all of them facing death because water (the second most essential element to life next to air) does not come out of a tap, a river, a bottle or even a municipal water system that provides water-to-go.

Maude Barlow, the senior adviser on water to the president of the UN General Assembly, notes that, in 2008, 2.2 million people (most of them children) died of water-borne illness worldwide. In India, for example, 165,742 schools have no available drinking water; pupils either bring water to school or do without. In Africa, women and their daughters are forced to travel inhumane distances just to get enough water to sustain life, and are then required to carry it home daily. This means Africa's daughters don't have time to go to school, and its mothers don't have time to develop job skills or find paying jobs.

wc1 Access to safe drinking water isn't just a third-world problem, though. In the U.S., the pesticide Atrazine - banned in Europe - is still being used, with some 60 to 70 million pounds applied annually, contaminating the drinking water supplies of one million Americans.

 Now, however, a solution has arrived. Called the Watercone, this device allows anyone, anywhere to extract potable water from sea water, brackish water, or even water contaminated by heavy metals. This solar powered water desalinator has been tested by CARE Germany and proven to remove arsenic, mercury and cadmium from standing water via evaporation. This water, though not of distilled standard, delivers drinking water in line with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, regardless of the water used in the pan.

As valuable as this invention is, it's important to note that the water delivered via solar evaporation still contains miniscule quantities of pollutants. This, however, is only relevant in terms of disease vectors. When used in the hot, arid climates of Africa, India and elsewhere, the temperature the initial water has to achieve to result in evaporation likely eliminates many disease-causing organisms as well, though tests have not established this.

wc2 How does the Watercone work? Fill up the base with water, place the transparent plastic cone over the top, and in 24 hours a trough around the edge of the cone will have accumulated between one and 1.5 liters (1.05 quarts) of fresh water.

One potential drawback: the Watercone is reportedly made of polycarbonate, one type of which is made from bisphenol A, the poisonous plastic almost banned from baby bottles in California in 2008. The site, however, calls its polycarbonate "environmentally friendly".  

The device, originally tested in a fishing village by the sea in Yemen - which struggles for every drop of drinking water it can get - has won certification from TÜV Rheinland Berlin Brandenburg, a leading provider of technical services worldwide, and has received 3 of the world's most prestigious design awards (the National Energy Globe Awards in 2007 and 2008, and the Kyoto World Water Grand Prize). The device has also undergone extensive academic and field testing in Europe, India, Thailand and Africa.

The units are anticipated to cost about $50 (£33.50) each, depending on the manufacturer. The cost could easily be supported, or supplemented, by any of the world's relief organizations. The problem was, the inventor - Stephan Augustin, a BMW group designer - wasn't able to find anyone willing to make them when the device was first approved for use.

More recently, reports indicate that Mage-Watermanagement GmbH from Munich Germany licensed the Watercone in 2008 and will start mass production and worldwide distribution in 2009. If true, it couldn't come a moment to soon for the word's parched billions.

Other related articles on Celsias:
Improve the Quality of Your Water Without Costing Our Planet

Potable Water in Desert Regions: Courtesy of WaterPyramid


Follow Celsias on Twitter: Celsiastweets

6 comments

If you see any unhelpful comments, please let us know immediately.

Charles M. 105°

Evaporation does not mean high temperature. Evaporation happens whenever the partial pressure of water vapour drops below the dewpoint. This even happens below freezing (which is how freeze drying works).

Evaporative purification can still transfer volatile compounds such as petroleum pollutants so you have to be careful how you use it.

I wouldn't freak out about the plastics used to make these things. They're a lot less toxic than the other pollutants being removed.

Ceramic filters can be made just as cheaply and perhaps work better than distillation and can filter much more per day.

We use very low-techgravity-fed Dalton water filter which gives us (a family of 4) all the drinking water we need. These filters are well known technology that have been used since the 1800s. This can be built for far less than $50.

It is ludicrous that the distillation unit costs $50. A larger unit, with many times the output, could be made for way less than $50.

Written in May 2009

Charles M. 105°

[continued]
With regard to carrying water in Africa.... I've lived for a few months carrying every drop of water I use, by bucket, from a stream. I suggest everyone do this at some stage in their life as a way to really connect with their water consumption.

It demonstrates cultural ignorance to suggest that carrying water is inhumane or that it interferes with developing skills which lead to a paying job. Many, if not most, people living in such rural settings live subsistence lives, growing all their own food, and have no time for, or access to, paying jobs.

Unless you have actually lived in a rural African setting, or equivalent, and made efforts to understand these people's values then I don't think you are qualified to make value judgments about their lifestyle and call some of their actions inhumane. From my value set I consider many of the money paying jobs that our modern society supports utterly pointless and far less humane.

Cost is one of the failing points of a $50 water purifier that only generates 1 litre or so per day. To get, say, 10l of water per day would require about 8 of these units (ie. $400). Many families have to live on $1 per day and $400 is more than a year's income.

btw: I don't consider myself an expert on rural African life, but I have lived in rural settings in Africa and can speak two African languages and have made attempts to understand the values and lifestyle of rural African people, so at least I know enough not to try make cross-cultural judgements.

Written in May 2009

Jeanne Roberts (anonymous)

The quote about inhumane is from Maude Barlow of the UN. The cost, $50, will hopefully be subsidized by the UN, but seems high to me as well. I'm a writer, Charles, not an investigative journalist; I synthesize and don't consider myself an expert on anything. No cross-cultural judgments are implied or intended.

Written in May 2009

Charles M. 105°

Jeanne: Sorry, my comments were not directed at you but were directed at the original author and anyone who would want to take those opinions onboard.

Cross cultural value judgements are a big barrier to more wealthy countries and societies providing effective aid. Instead of listening to what the people need and how to deliver solutions, impractical and insensitive "solutions" get prescribed from the wrong value set.

Rather than subsidise the cost for costly technology that needs to be manufactured with specialised equipment and materials it is far better to develop cheaper and simpler technology and processes that can be manufactured in the communities and repaired with minimal special parts. For example, a water pump with teflon bearings and working surfaces might be more efficient, but Fedexing spares from Europe to some African village is impractical. Rather design and provide a water pump that can be repaired with found materials (a bit of tyre tube rubber) and simple tools.

Written in May 2009

Charles, no apology necessary. I've been a reporter for years, and read much worse. I simply replied to note the actual source of the comment. And again, I agree with your analysis about costs and a lack of sensitivity on the part of wealthier countries. A prime example would be insecticide-treated bednets, which have to be UN-subsidized to make them affordable. Why not have Africans make them, in local factories instead, out of hemp or cotton?

Written in May 2009

rafael afan www.watercone.com.br (anonymous)

WATERCONE, CAN BE USED ALSO AS FRUIT AND VEGETABLE DESIDRATATION.AND IN BRASIL DO A LOT OF SUCESS WWW.WATERCONE.COM.BR .SO THIS INVENTION IS FANTASTIC, BECAUSE YOU CAN HAVE WATER ALSO FROM PLANTS!

Written in January 2011

Add a comment
  • to get your picture next to your comment (not a member yet?).
  • (hint: logged in Celsias members don't have to fill in this)
  • Posted on May 11, 2009. Listed in:

    See other articles written by Jeanne »

    6 comments


    Pledge to do these related actions

    Buy a greener car!, 1°

    I know cars aren't particularly green but many of us HAVE to have a car ...

    Install a programmable thermostat, 431°

    Let the computer do the thinking for you by programming it to lower your house ...

    Switch from paper to continuous cloth towels for the office , 21°

    Paper towels are more expensive and more harmful to the environment than cabinet towels (aka ...

    Follow these related projects

    Featured Companies & Orgs