US Emissions Reach 20 Year Low , But Don't Take a Bow Yet

World Watch Institute

Climate scientists are getting their fair share of surprises this year, from the record-breaking ice melt in the Arctic to the fact that first-quarter U.S. carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions have hit their lowest point since 1992. CO2 emissions from energy consumption for the January-March period fell to 1.34 billion metric tons, down 8 percent from a year ago. While the depressed economy and rising renewable energy generation have contributed to emissions reductions in the past few years, the early 2012 low-point is due mainly to a combination of three factors: the relatively warm winter, reduced gasoline demand, and the continued decline in coal-fired electricity.

Carbon emissions from energy consumption fell to 1.34 billion metric tons(EIA)

 

The declining demand for coal power is especially significant. Although emissions from natural gas and petroleum each dropped nearly 3 percent from the same period in 2011 (mainly because of lower heating demands in the mild winter), coal emissions fell 18 percent, to their lowest point since 1986.

 

 

coal The first half of 2012 also saw significant additions of new renewable energy capacity, although natural gas plants accounted for the vast majority of new capacity in states that traditionally rely on coal power. The low price of natural gas, bolstered by the U.S. shale gas boom, has driven many power producers to shift from dirtier coal generation to cleaner natural gas-fired power plants. When burned, natural gas emits around half of the CO2emissions as coal combustion.

But it’s not time to sit back on our “we-just-solved-climate-change” laurels just yet. A recent article in Yale Environment 360 cautions strongly against getting caught up in a frenzy of U.S. natural gas development. The authors, researchers at the Colorado-based Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, argue that throwing all of the nation’s weight behind a natural gas-centric power sector could risk price increases for gas, and that banking heavily on high estimates of recoverable gas reserves links U.S. fuel security to very uncertain assumptions.


While replacing coal-fired generation with natural gas-fired power is certainly a first step toward climate change mitigation, it is important to ensure that natural gas and renewable energy generation become cooperative, not competitive, as both sectors grow.

It’s also important to consider the decline in U.S. COemissions in a global context. Even though U.S.china emissions may have dropped significantly, China’s energy demand and emissions continue to grow. Declines in 2011 emissions in both the United States and Europe were negated as global emissions rose 3 percent to an all-time high of 34 billion tons. And while total U.S. COemissions may be at a low, U.S. emissions per capita are still well above most of the rest of the world. In 2011, the United States produced 17.3 tons of CO2per capita, compared to China’s 7.2 tons.

In the environmental arena, one learns to celebrate the small victories—and this certainly counts. Replacing coal generation with natural gas is arguably a step in the right direction in achieving a clean energy sector, but it will not be the end-all-be-all of climate change solutions. Rather than throwing all of our efforts into natural gas generation, we must focus on developing natural gas resources in conjunction with, and in support of, renewable energy. Cooperation between the two sectors is vital to creating a stable clean energy system and reducing emissions on more than a temporary basis.

 

This article is from Reese Rogers at Worldwatch

1 comment

If you see any unhelpful comments, please let us know immediately.

Sid A. 60°

What if America were to increase it's natural gas energy efficiency? Instead of wasting 20% to 60% as HOT exhaust into the atmosphere (global warming) this natural gas was to be consumed to over 90% energy efficiency?
What is not wasted today, will be there to be used another day.
The technology of Condensing Flue Gas Heat Recovery is designed to recover the energy out of these waste exhaust gases. Then COOL exhaust will be vented into the atmosphere.
The US DOE states that for every million Btu's of energy recovered from these waste exhaust gases, and this recovered energy is utilized back in the building or facility, 118 lbs of CO2 will NOT be put into the atmosphere.
America according to the EIA in 2011 consumed over 17.5 Trillion cu.ft. of natural gas in commercial buildings, industry and to the power plants. What if a lot of this natural gas had been consumed efficiently?
What can America do to increase it's energy efficiency, and further reduce global warming and it's greenhouse gas emissions?
This is America, and if America were to decide that it Wanted To, anything and everything is possible.

Written in September 2012

Add a comment
  • to get your picture next to your comment (not a member yet?).
  • Posted on Sept. 10, 2012. Listed in:

    1 comment

    Pledge to do these related actions

    Sign The Appeal Against Patents On Seeds, 69°

    Many people are aware of the trend in patenting GM foods, but many are not ...

    Switch from paper to continuous cloth towels for the office , 21°

    Paper towels are more expensive and more harmful to the environment than cabinet towels (aka ...

    Ask The Climate Question, 1°

    Join and promote the campaign to raise climate change on the UK political agenda over ...

    Follow these related projects

    TRANSITION OREGON

    OREGON, United States

    Carpool King

    New Zealand

    Featured Companies & Orgs