Throbgoblins: Burning Man

Marc Roberts




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Renewable energy, - if it is to be resilient enough to manage the transition from carbon based mass consumption to a sustainable future - must be accessed through a technology based on materials in plentiful supply. There's no point basing it on kryptonite or on materials that are prohibitively costly to access or convert. There is only so much platinum (or uranium, for that matter) to go around.

The idea that we can carry on regardless and simply substitute another power source for our present ones is foolish in the extreme. Carbon was a once-only offer. The party's over.

Energy is an expression of labour and time. What human or horse muscle can achieve in an hour pales beside the work rate of carbon fueled engines. We have created a global culture that is entirely dependent on more labour and more time than is available without burning fossil fuels.

When the fossil fuels are no longer available, and the alternatives prove inadequate to the immense and wasteful scale of our chosen way of life - how will the powerful seek to satisfy their "needs" for additional labour and time? In the time honoured tradition -of enslavement and conquest? How will the powerful deal with those who compete with them for labour and time? In the time honoured tradition of enslavement and conquest.  We are a predictable species, by and large (give or take the odd black swan moment).

There is no alternative energy source that can meet our "need" to have our cake and eat it too.  Reduce. Re-use. Recycle.  One might add - Re-Design

Related Reading:
Throbgoblins: Cartoon Capture & Storage
Throbgoblins: Foxtrot

2 comments

If you see any unhelpful comments, please let us know immediately.

C Robb W. 454°

The concept of substitutability is key to the continuation of neoliberalist capitalism. "When a natural resource runs out we'll just replace it with something else ripped from the earth or developed through human ingenuity" It is what lies behind the constant mantra of the "technology will save us", business as usual advocates. Problem is, it makes no sense.

Consumerism cannot continue.
Learn to do without now and it will be less painful in the future for all concerned.

I like the 4th R, redesign, but I think it should be Reduce, Reduce, Reduce and only then consider the other 3. There is no more cake to eat.

Written in February 2009

Carol S. 114°

Supremely well said.

Written in February 2009

Add a comment
  • to get your picture next to your comment (not a member yet?).
  • (hint: logged in Celsias members don't have to fill in this)
  • Posted on Feb. 12, 2009. Listed in:

    See other articles written by Marc »

    2 comments


    Pledge to do these related actions

    Become a Climate Precinct Captain Today!, 11°

    There's no doubt about it -- 2009 is the most important year the climate movement ...

    We Need Clean Energy, Not Clean Coal!, 110°

    During the Vice Presidential debate, both Senator Biden and Governor Palin touting their support for ...

    Follow these related projects

    Solar Solutions

    Island Heights, United States

    Power To The People

    Sao Bras Alportel, Portugal

    Featured Companies & Orgs