Earth 2100: Is This the Final Century of our Civilization? (+ Video)

Brian Gordon

A starting note: ABC clearly took the position that the reality of climate change is accepted by pretty much everyone with any sense at this point. What the effects will be and when they will hit us, is another question, and one that ABC recently attempted to answer in “Earth 2100: Is this the final century of our civilization?

worldend I watched this show expecting to be disappointed. I expected sensationalized nonsense as the best case scenario, and pseudo-scientific claptrap and questioning of global warming as the tired and most likely case.

Earth 2100 was neither. It was a pleasant surprise, in a truly depressing way. First, there were no scientific surprises. The producers used mainstream science on topics like climate change and peak oil, and extrapolated what our world would be like over the coming century if we continue as we are. The results are not pretty or comforting, but they do correspond with current scientific expectations.

And second, the future is truly frightening. Perhaps the most chilling effect was the population countdown, which unwound from almost 9 billion people to well under 3 billion in a very short time. Few of those people died of old age.

Is it credible? Unfortunately, yes. Numerous climate scientists were consulted and appeared in the two-hour special. In addition, respected and prominent people gave their time and put their reputation on the line to appear in Earth 2100, including:

  • John Holdren – On leave from Harvard  to be Obama’s Science Advisor
  • Jared Diamond – Author of Collapse, a study of civilizations that have collapsed throughout history
  • James Woolsey – Former head of the CIA who considers threats to national security

It certainly fit with my research on what we can expect if oil were in permanent short supply, and with the progression of climate change.

Wise parents worry about the habits of their children, because our habits can be difficult to change as adults. Parents know that good habits set us on a path toward success and happiness, but bad habits can lead any person astray to a dark future.

This is why, for example, parents are embarrassed when their child won’t share toys; greed (selfishness) is damaging to us as individuals and as a society. While nobody can precisely predict the future, the habits our society has developed have set us on a selfish, greedy course towards self-destruction.

The alarming realities that Earth 2100 summed up were:

  • Climate change: Humans have pumped enough greenhouse gases into the atmosphere to cause climate change.
  • Peak oil: There is a fixed amount of oil buried in our planet – the earth isn’t magically making more – and at some point it will start to run down. That point appears to be roughly now, and will result in significant increases in the price of oil – and therefore almost everything else.
  • Pandemics: The reason the swine flu recently caused such concern among health organizations worldwide is that killer viruses and plagues sweep the planet regularly, and it’s their job to worry about – and hopefully prevent or at least limit – the next one. When you consider that the last big one – the Spanish Flu outbreak in 1918 – killed 50-100 million people, that it infected approximately one-third of the entire human population, and that it primarily killed healthy young adults, you can appreciate their concern.
  • Population overshoot: There are too many people on the planet for us to live the way we do. This is not about the American Way of Life™, but how we achieve it. We treat the planet as a limitless resource and garbage dump, and that is folly.

people Let’s set aside pandemics and the population problem. The former are somewhat random, and we may develop vaccines or other defenses – or not. 

Either way, smart people are working on it, and there’s not much more can be done. Population is expected to peak at 9 billion in 2050, and we may or may not find a way to support all of us. If not, there will be a die-back.

The key to whether we survive and thrive, regardless of population or pandemics, is how we react to climate change and the end of cheap fossil fuels.

Earth 2100 depicted oil shortages and price spikes as larger-scale repetitions of the oil shocks of the 1970’s. There were line-ups for gas, and sometimes gas stations sold out, at times resulting in violence. People bought smaller cars, moved closer to work, insulated their homes – all of this happened before, but this time it would be permanent.

Less easy to depict are the economic problems that would result. Our entire economy is based on cheap oil, and price increases would be devastating to the American Way of Life. Everything from tractors to transport trucks to ships run on oil; if the price goes up, so does the price of everything they produce or carry, from food to clothes, televisions to building materials. James Howard Kunstler has described this well in The Long Emergency, and was interviewed for Earth 2100.

Overall, I thought ABC made a pretty decent first attempt to picture a future taking the realities of climate change and peak oil into account. There is no comparison to the ridiculously sensationalized The Day After Tomorrow, which was essentially The Poseidon Adventure planet-wide.

With Earth 2100, ABC is telling the truth. These really could be our twilight years, ready or not, if we continue on this path. As Earth 2100 also pointed out, we still have options, but our choices narrow and become much more costly – in lives and money – the longer we wait. ABC hinted at a better way, and it is true that the solutions are all ready to be rolled out. That we’re not doing so, given the consequences, should be a crime.

“All for ourselves and nothing for other people seems, in every age of the world, to have been the vile maxim of the masters of mankind.” Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations.

Check out Earth 2100 on ABC's website here.  

More stories you may enjoy on Celsias:

Does Anybody Really Know What Time It Is? The Environmental Dooms Day Clock.

How the Rich Are Destroying the Earth.

Follow us on Twitter: Celsiastweets.

8 comments

If you see any unhelpful comments, please let us know immediately.

Robert A. 30°

This is available on Torrents, I will have it on DVD by tonight, looks interesting, thanks for bringing it to our attention

Written in June 2009

Robert A. 30°

The first 75 minutes was ok, but missing a few facts IE discussing the planet @ 4 degrees higher temp, when we (those with their eyes open anyway) know that 3 degrees is the death of the Amazon and probably the massive release of methane hydrates from the tundra and ocean bed, so yeah good attempt but a tad Al Gore ish for me.
This 6 minute interview had more facts that we don’t want to know … and I got Darren Hughes to sit down and watch this skit http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4Czw3Y_ARE&feature=PlayList&p=49C2C1A5995927C6&index=30 on June 23 2008, he understood after watching it that Kiwi Saver for one thing was a joke, yet less than 24 hours later (showing the attention span of a Guppy) he was promoting Transmission Gully.
I didn’t watch the rest of the movie as it seemed to fall into happy chapter mode, no doubt promoting the idea that squiggly light bulbs are going to save us and if we change the soap we use in the shower all will be fine and dandy, so lets keep having babies … with the World War One attitude that the more people you throw over the top of the trenches the more will survive the machine guns.
I give ABC a ‘can do better’ mark
Robert
www.oilcrash.com
Write to a politician every week, or do not complain when you and your children are starving.

Written in June 2009

Robert - thanks for the comments. I think the ABC show is primarily noteworthy because it aired on mainstream television, it presented a science-based scenario, and it made clear that this would be the scenario if we continue on our current path.

The show did NOT suggest that small measures will save us. In fact, it depicted a huge population crash (billions died) and the end of civilisation as we know it.

I hope it leads other networks and people to create similar realistic scenarios, because video/images have great power to move people, as shown by An Inconvenient Truth.

Written in June 2009

Robert A. 30°

Hi Brian
I will have to watch the second half.
As far as mainstream media putting movies out , and what good it does??? The below movie was played on Canadian TV
http://oilcrash.com/articles/oc_movie.htm

And this was screened on Australian TV http://www.abc.net.au/science/crude/

Also Leonardo De Caprio's The 11th Hour was at 3 picture thearters in Wellington when it first came out, it only lasted 2 weeks ( I think?) ... good on them for selling copies for only $5.00 us .....
I had something like 24,000 hits on my website the night Campbell Live screened 7 min's on oilcrash.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTDgYIWu0nA&feature=channel_page , but nothing seams to happen, the politicians keep going 100 degrees in the wrong direction, promising pie in the sky idiot dreams IE Kiwi Saver or massive road building projects in Auckland, "Party Central" being one of the most recent idiot ideas from John Key .... and he got away with it???. Apathy rules I'm afraid ...Peak Oil/ climate change movies and documentaries need to be on TV every night, and the government need to hold cross party discussions (as asked by the Maori Party 4 times now) on Peak Oil and Climate Change. The Poms did this about 18 months ago now >>> nothing came of it... but I'm sure 'we' could do better, if a meeting/conference was held. Not even the Green Party have supported the Maori Party? go figure??
If Kiwi's were as informed and as 'green' as we pretend we are then the Bee Hive should be buried in correspondence from concerned Kiwi's but no, most of them are asleep or just incapable of sending postage free letters to explain their personal distress at the near future.
I think most people will just change the channel especially while there is motor racing or big game fishing still being screened. By the time they are willing to watch informative truthful information will be about a week or so after the lights go out. I don't think there will be many plasma screens wearing out soon enough.
I think there are only 2 human 'creatures' that will die a natural death, that will be a 70 year old or an unfertilized egg.
I've pirated or copied then given away about 14,000 DVDs over the past 4-5 years, (600 to parliament) this is a per capita equivalent of over 1 million DVDs in the US. We are at the point of free spinning in mid air away from the edge of the cliff ala the Coyote in the Road Runner, yet nearly all of the public (including our leaders) refuse to look down or even realize gravity is about to suck us into oblivion ;)
Just like the Easter Islanders placing crowns on top of the statues didn't save them, building more infrastructure that is oil dependent ... including economic scams like KS (as backed by the Green Party?) will not hold back what is coming. Yet our so called leaders will do nothing until they think the people are serious, which clearly they aren't. Like Robert Hersch said "It is a people problem, the people do not want to know"
bed time

Written in June 2009

saidulu babu (anonymous)

it is end of world. the technology makes unhappy because. every living being they does know how it cause

Written in October 2009

William (anonymous)

There is really only one way out--the population needs to be reduced in a big, big way--1 person survives for every 100 people that doesn't. Earth population goes from 6 billin to 60 million. Cull the herd & survive--or don't & don't.

Written in January 2010

andris (anonymous)

Those plagues were a bit unsupported by facts and, in the spirit of the movie, how recycling can prevent flu virus from mutation into something nasty?

Also, how about that swine flu? Words like 'bull' and 'fertilizer' comes in mind.

Written in January 2010

Tom King (anonymous)

I notice that debate has been polarized between Climate Deniers and Climate Optimists. I Think we need to call for new debates between Climate Optimists and Climate Realists. By Realists I mean people who start with the assumption that no CO2 reductions take place and that the tundra becomes a sauna. The starting assumption should be 1000ppm CO2 and an 8 degree C. temperature increase. I want real predictions, not this fairy tale stuff. Then the debates will get interesting.

Written in June 2011

Add a comment
  • to get your picture next to your comment (not a member yet?).
  • Posted on June 19, 2009. Listed in:

    See other articles written by Brian »

    8 comments


    Pledge to do these related actions

    Choose natural products for your garden, 288°

    Reduce the amount of fertilizer and pesticide going into water tables and natural environments by ...

    Put up a bird nesting box, 112°

    Birds, especially species which rely on cavities in trees for nesting, are dwindling because of ...

    Volunteer at a community garden , 11°

    Commit some volunteer hours to helping out community gardens and/or urban farms this spring and ...

    Follow these related projects

    EVS WWOOF Bulgaria - 2008-BG-25

    Bulgaria, Bulgaria

    Media information on line

    Melbourne, Australia

    Featured Companies & Orgs