Energy Efficiency Could Save U.S. a Whopping $1.2 Trillion

Timothy B. Hurst

A new report finds that the low-hanging fruit of energy efficiency is the "single most promising resource" in pursuing energy affordability and security.

In addition to the tremendous savings potential for consumers and businesses, the report (pdf), by the global consulting firm Mckinsey and Company, finds that elevating energy efficiency to a national priority could also spur the creation of 600,000-900,000 long-term green jobs and reduce our overall energy consumption by 23 percent.

cfl

What are the implications of the above findings? Energy efficiency is an enormous (and enormously cheap) energy resource for the U.S., "but only if the nation can craft a comprehensive and innovative approach to unlock it."

One of those barriers is seed money; the $1.2 trillion wouldn't come for free. The investment, according to the report's authors, would be about $522 billion over the next ten years, not including program implementation. But an investment of that scale could slash energy consumption in 2020 by 9.1 quadrillion BTUs, or 23% of projected demand, potentially avoiding up to 1.1 gigatons of greenhouse gas emissions annually.

Mckinsey and Company found that substantial gains in efficiency could be made by:

1. Recognizing true potential of energy efficiency and prioritizing;
2. Encouraging old as well as new approaches to efficiency at both national and regional levels;
3. Identifying ways to provide the upfront funding for energy efficiency plans and programs;
4. Building collaborative processes with utilities, regulators, government agencies, manufacturers and consumers, and;
5. Fostering innovation in the development and deployment of energy efficiency technologies to sustain ongoing productivity.

Overcoming Significant and Persistent Barriers

To unlock the potential outlined in the report, "significant and persistent barriers" need to be addressed to spur demand for energy efficiency and adopt wide-ranging energy management systems and practices. Sounds easy enough, right? Not so fast, say the report's authors.

First off, the easiest gains in energy efficiency have already been made and much of the low-hanging fruit has already been picked. Since 1980, energy consumption per unit of floor space has decreased 11% in the residential sector, 21% in the commercial sector and 41% in the industrial sector. But while significant advancements have been made, the report strongly suggests we are not done -- largely because of the persistent social, structural and institutional barriers.

These barriers include but are not limited to: fragmented incentive structures, ownership transfer, transactional barriers, pricing distortions, educational gaps, stubborn customs/behaviors, prohibitive bundling, product availability and improper use of equipment.

Perhaps the most significant message of the Mckinsey report is that efficiency is an energy resource and should be framed as such. And while the persistent barriers alluded to above do exist, there very existence means there is tremendous opportunity for substantial gains in efficiency.

Follow Tim Hurst on twitter
Image via © Narcisa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 comments

If you see any unhelpful comments, please let us know immediately.

Erin W.

They should stop making non-efficient appliances. Thus forcing people to become energy efficient. That's my thought anyway

Written in August 2009

Mike (anonymous)

The problem with all of these initiatives is that they fly in the face of how real people interact with the world. Sure, if you see yourself as a 'do-gooder', you'll buy $20 light bulbs to save $25 over the next forty years. But the rest of us are too busy working to worry about luxuries such as that.

The true answer is tapping into the Great Human Psyche. Don't try ramming crap down our throats and telling us that it's 'good for us'. Make more energy! What a novel approach!

Wait... it's not novel.... it's what we humans have been doing since we crawled down from the trees: Need more corn? Plant another acre. Need to move something big? Make a bigger truck. Get it? Need more energy? Make it. Go nuclear. Drill where the oil is (not on the depleted fields Congress is willing to 'share'.

It's tiring listening to people like the author pounding the same talking points we've heard for the last forty years: "No energy for you unless you use the energy I like."

Go big... or go home... either way, leave me alone and let me get on with the business of earning a living.

Written in August 2009

George P. Burdell (anonymous)

Problem with most of the green movement is that the people involved have ulterior motives. Al Gore is probably the finest example of the preach the technologies that you are personally invested in and own, while not talking about real, practical solutions that are out there.

Probably the chief, easy, and free thing that everyone can do is unplug their home electronics and battery chargers when they are not in use. These so-called vampire devices pull power 24/7, even if not switched on. I have seen several studies that have concluded that these devices alone waste the equivalent of all the power produced from the US's nuclear power plants combined. On average, most studies I have seen say this could save the average American household something on the order of 5-10$ a month or about $20 per device a year. That of course adds up to a whole lot of savings, for something that costs nothing to do.

Instead of forcing everyone at gun point to buy energy efficient appliances, which people are probably going to do anyway, especially if marketers would simplify the lingo on what is and is not energy efficient; home electronics manufacturers could just stop making all their devices "instant-on," which is the culprit in all these vampire devices. As a result, you would drastically cut down power usage and would only have to be inconvenienced with your appliances taking a few (2-3) seconds to power on. I know I personally would by "none instant-on" if given the choice and I think most people would as well.

Written in August 2009

Raleigh Latham (anonymous)

Why? Why are you people so up in arms about Energy Efficiency. "It's not for us normal foks, derp". Just think,1.2 trillion dollars, and millions of tons of C02 averted by enforcing energy efficiency standards. Were trying to save our country, and the world. If we don't do something right now, then my children, and your children will grow up in a world ravaged by runaway climate change, because we were too "busy" to do something about it.
Also, write your Senator and support bill H2454 Clean Energy and Security Act.
The Ice sheet shrank by tens of thousands of miles this summer, how many years till it's ice free? 10? 5? What will it take to give you a wake up call.?

Written in August 2009

Add a comment
  • to get your picture next to your comment (not a member yet?).
  • (hint: logged in Celsias members don't have to fill in this)
  • Posted on Aug. 6, 2009. Listed in:

    See other articles written by Timothy B. »

    4 comments


    Pledge to do these related actions

    Use a motorbike or scooter to get around, 43°

    OK we all know that it would be ideal if we could all walk or ...

    Start or Join a Transition Movement, 56°

    Here in the UK we have a movement called Transition Towns. It has spread to ...

    Food for Change: eat only plant-based foods for one whole WEEK, 111°

    What is it like to eat only plant-based foods for a whole week? If you ...

    Follow these related projects

    Food for Change

    Global, New Zealand

    Featured Companies & Orgs