Public Resources for Private Profit

Craig Mackintosh

Maarten Stapper - former Research Scientist at CSIRO Plant Industries
The CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation) is the national government body for scientific research in Australia. As a publicly funded body it should be working for the public good. Recent press releases indicate a potential industry conflict of interests that has resulted in the sacking of one of Australia's leading soil scientists, resulting in a setback for Australia's ability to be carbon neutral and to improve the health of their environment and their citizens.

The title of this post is the title of the following recently released press release that outlines the drama:

CSIRO Plant Industry sacked leading soil and organic researcher Dr Maarten Stapper last week. His research on healthier soil systems and criticisms of crop Gene Manipulation (GM) upset CSIRO management.

"This travesty of justice shows again that priorities for taxpayer-funded research are grossly distorted by CSIRO contracts with companies, that direct public funds to private profits," says Bob Phelps, director of Gene Ethics.

"Stapper was sacked because GM giants like Bayer and Monsanto can't patent know-how on healthier soils," he says.

"Scientists who publish negative evidence about GM technology and its products are victimised, everywhere in the world," he says.

"Australian governments spent $1.29 billion on GM research from 2003 to 2005 alone (Warren Truss MP, Media Release, June 2005) and how this money is allocated should be the subject of public discussion," he says.

"Gene Ethics calls for a democratic system of funding policy and decisions to set research and development priorities. Our scarce R&D resources are now being misallocated by those who stand to gain most," he says.

"GM has failed to fulfill its promises so Australian taxpayers and producers are ripped off," Mr Phelps says.

"Even where success is claimed, the companies with patented genes benefit most. For instance, GM cotton was developed by CSIRO and Cotton Australia at taxpayer and grower expense, but Monsanto's technology fee is well over $150 for every hectare grown," he says.

"Billions are spent on GM, but research on the sustainable biological and organic farming systems needed to cope with climate change and the end of oil is under-funded," he says.

"CSIRO chief Jeremy Burdon's claim that environmentally friendly systems are 'not a long term viable strategy' is refuted by their success. Sustainable organics are the fastest growing sector of Australian farming and they will not use GM or synthetic chemicals," he says.

"Repairing Australia's systemic agronomic and environmental problems on farms is urgent. But the funds go to GM crop research that can't solve our core problems - salty, acidic, chemical polluted, drought affected, denuded, and waterlogged soils," he says.

"Public-good research is starved of funds as it does not enrich the companies or keep hi-tech lab scientists working on GM plants," he says.

"For instance, disbanding the CRC for Weed Management because it lacked corporate partners was another foolish, short-sighted travesty," he says.

"CSIRO is failing us badly. Gene Ethics calls on state governments to fund Dr Stapper's soil health research, increase his funding and recruit more staff for sustainable farming projects," Mr Phelps concludes. - News Media Release, GM Free Ireland (do text search for CSIRO)

At this point in climate change history, people like Maarten Stapper are just the kind we should be financing and supporting. Seeing them get sacked and sidelined instead is of great concern. We've written before about the incredible carbon sequestration potential of healthy soils, of which Maarten Stapper is acutely aware. Maarten has worked to bring his research findings to the people that need them - farmers in Australia that are grappling with increasingly stubborn soils, despite the promises of industry giants keen to sell their wares. Maarten has urged a focus on healthy soil microbiology, showing that increasing soil health results in a dramatic reduction in the necessity for fossil fuel inputs (fertilisers, herbicides, pesticides), and dramatic increases in plant health (with its corresponding reduction in pest problems), and significant improvement in carbon sequestration - a critical element in our battle with global warming.
Dr Maarten Stapper a Principal Research Scientist at CSIRO-Plant Industries will show farmers how to improve the profitability of their operations by harnessing natural soil processes. According to Dr Stapper a healthy soil leads to better crops and pastures requiring less inputs for similar productivity, resulting in healthy animals and improved food quality for healthy humans. In the process soil organic carbon can be doubled which also helps society by slowing climate change. - The Third OFA National Organic Conference, 22-23 July 2006
But, such forms of agriculture put natural systems back into harmony, and put soil life and beneficial insects back to work - seriously impacting on the role of agribusiness in their sale of chemicals and genetically modified seeds.
"The Biological Farmers of Australia is deeply concerned that CSIRO has decided to scrap this area of research that is critical not only to the organic sector, but also to the thousands of farmers around Australia right now developing better soil biology – specifically during a time of massive investment in finding sustainable and effective means of sequestering atmospheric carbon," said Scott Kinnear spokesperson for BFA.

... "We have for many years been concerned at the commercialisation of research within CSIRO whereby patentable technologies with income generation potential are favoured. This applies to their research into genetically engineered foods which has cost CSIRO many tens of millions of dollars for no commercial food product to show. Remember the failed CSIRO GE field pea that caused an allergic reaction in mice, shelved last year at a huge cost to the taxpayer.

"We believe that the States should look closely at employing Maarten Stapper, who by all accounts was one of the most sought after presenters at field days and seminars because his research was cutting edge and provided real immediate benefits. We are most concerned that CSIRO is prepared to say they see no future in organic farming, yet are prepared to waste extraordinary amounts of money supporting genetic engineering that the general public overall does not want. Demand for organic food is growing at about 15% per year globally and estimates put the market at more than $50 billion AUD."

"We must remember that European farming has been disastrous for our ancient and fragile soils in Australia and one of the fundamental keys to soil fertility under our unique conditions, which are so different to North America and Europe, is the healthy maintenance of biological activity in the soil. Farmers are aware that healthy soil biology increases carbon which improves structure and capacity to hold water and ultimately leads to an improved soil which will yield more food of higher quality."

"It seems that CSIRO has conveniently ended their one small research program supporting biological and organic farming while at the same time ending the employment of a scientist who was privately critical of genetic engineering. The fact that he was very much admired and supported by the farming community really adds insult to injury with this decision." - Australian Food News

This makes the ol' saying about the two sure things in life (death and taxes) take a new twist - if our taxes are paying for our own destruction.

12 comments

If you see any unhelpful comments, please let us know immediately.

Ian Cleland (anonymous)

I just watched Australian Story on ABC1 about Maarten Stapper. I just have a question for Maarten is he speaking to Peter Andrews writer of "Back from the brink" and "Beyond the brink". Peter is like Maarten doing the work on the farm and showing others better farming practices.

I lived in Tamworth when I was a kid and was always concerned with the massive erosion in and around farm land back during the sixties.

I am concerned about the quality of the food we produce and how this will affect the future for our children.

Ian Cleland
The Walking Man

Written last month

Emma Daly (anonymous)

I also just watched Aus Story on ABC1 about Maarten Stapper and I truely hope that someday, he can rub the sucess and pure effectiveness of biological faming in CSIRO's face. How can the CSIRO see no futire in organic farming when that is exactally how farming first begun so many thoudands of years ago? A simple cross section comparison of biologically famed soil to commercially fertizlied soil is such basic evidence, how can the CSIRO honestly and ehtically ignore this honestly and ethically?

Mr Stapper I truely wish you all the best, and I want to help you turn that biological farmiong wave into a flood.
Please let me know how I can join your team of future farming practices and principles of the world.

Emma Daly

Written last month

Sue & David White (anonymous)

We too watched the Australian Story last night and wanted to scream at the CSIRO's smug negativity- surely Maarten Stapper's research & common sense approach to this huge problem should at least been given a chance and backed by the Government. What harm will it do? Not fill the pockets of the 'Powers that be' could be the reason, don't you think? We are not farmers but have a few bare acres which we intend replanting with natives. We would like to replenish & nourish the sandy soil in the best way, we hope to try Maartens method- it might catch on....

Written last month

Sally (anonymous)

I also watched Australian Story and googled to try a find out where I could hear Maarten Stapper speak. Anyone out there know? Looks like we have awoken this page!

Written last month

Dr Ron Alexander (anonymous)

What a gutsy individual Maartin Strapper is.

His dedication opitomizes what extraordinary as distinct from ordinary science is about. His courage in the face of adversity stands as an example to all who see themselves as inventors. The tenacity he has shown in transforming dreams into reality positions him as a national hero and acts as a shining light of encouragment to all who are seeking to improve their and other people's lot.

Ron Alexander
Australian Institute of Innovation

Written last month

Rosemarie Robb (anonymous)

It is clear to anyone who has ever seen healthy, fertile, organically maintained soil, and compared it to the lifeless dust, completely lacking in any structure or humus, that the CSIRO's glib dismissal of the merits of organic methods can only mean one thing: They are dependent on the financial support of the big chemical manufacturers and obligated to be loyal to them as a result.
The empirical evidence worldwide that natural farming methods provide the only way to keep land capable of producing food in the long term, is so overwhelming that I would almost say there is really no need for further scientific research. The soil and the kind of yield it can give speaks for itself. What there IS enormous need for is public education and widespread advice and guidance to farmers about how they can rehabilitate their soil and bring it back to life, and Maarten Stapper is doing a fantastic job of that. I hope the wider population supports people like him in every possible way and likewise stands behind the farmers who already use biological farming methods, for our survival, in the face of climate change and peak oil actually depends on them! In my view there has to be a massive return, globally, to sustainable farming methods, such as are used in Permaculture and Biodynamic and Organic forms of agriculture, if there is to be any hope of creating and maintaining some form of food securtity for people. The knowledge already exists. What we need is many more people like Maarten who are willing to go out on a limb and stand up for what they believe in and know to be right. The evidence that he is correct in saying that the health of the soil is paramount to successful food growing is huge and can be found all over the world. It is by now painfully obvious that we cannot rely on governments to do what is necessary. The changes have to happen at a grass roots level, if you can forgive this awful but irresistible pun! People like Maarten are crucial to this change. More power to them!
If anyone is interested there is a very informative film about the impressive yields obtainable in a thriving Permaculture system at the folowing address:
http://www.viddler.com/explore/PermaScience/videos/4/

Rosemarie Robb

Written last month

John Sherwood (anonymous)

After viewing the program the only thing I could think of was how are these CSIRO people able to keep their job.They have to be influenced by these major companies like Monsanto .I will be fronting my local member to give strong support for Maarten Stapper.Also asking why there is not an enquiry into his dismissal.We need many more people like him.

Written last month

A (anonymous)

Maarten Stapper.... If only we had a few more.

Written last month

Dr Ron Alexander (anonymous)

To Maarten Stapper

Please accept my humble apologies. I spelt your name and the word 'epitomizes' incorrectly in my earlier post.

Ron Alexander
Australian Institute of Innovation

Written last month

Bill Rose (anonymous)

re Maarten Stapper dismissal by CSIRO.
Obviously some one in CSIRO or above is on the take. this is the result of commercial bribes on public officials as seen with oil verses electric cars, selling natural gas to the Chinese for 3 cents a litre when we pay 60 cents for lpg, gas bottles are filled only to 70% because of "government safety regulations", promotion of medical procedures and pharmaceuticals when unadulterated food and exercise would fix 80% of problems and show a longer life expectancy as Natham Pritican proved with cancer and heart disease.
CSIRO's accounts should be investigated.

Written last month

Jane A.

I was appalled to learn of the shortsightedness of CSIRO in their attitude to Dr Stapper. We certainly need more people like him and we do not need to be going down the GM trail - is it too late to change that path? I had not heard of Celsias before but have now joined and look forward to further discussions.
Jane Aslett
http://www.wellness-decisions.com

Written last month

Angelena Jasny (anonymous)

I would like to see Mr Stapper giving talks to children in schools. I pay for arts council visits, I would like to pay for him or delegates of his to educate my children about biological farming. Our school children will soon be the keepers of our land. Let them know that they have the choice, and give them hope that they can maintain their own livelyhood in the future by understanding and living 'with' our land, instead of 'off' our land. Surely, not only will we be able to sustain the land we have, but we should be able to make arable land that is now considered useless?! And we have a huge country - we could feed the world. Surely these chemical companies could broaden their horizons and begin a transition to becoming supporters of the environment instead of it killers?

Written last month

Add a comment
  • to get your picture next to your comment (not a member yet?).
  • (hint: logged in Celsias members don't have to fill in this)
  • Posted on March 30, 2007. Listed in:

    See other articles written by Craig »

    12 comments


    Pledge to do these related actions

    Crowdfund a Brew Hostel, 11°

    When you've got a Sustainable Cohousing Network, Crowdfunding a Brew Hostel is the logical next ...

    No Meat Week: Help Stop Global Warming!, 228°

    http://www.thepoint.com/campaigns/no-meat-week-help-stop-global-warming Did you know that if every American who eats meat daily decided to have ...

    Follow these related projects

    TRANSITION OREGON

    OREGON, United States

    Featured Companies & Orgs