Nanosolar's Breakthrough - Solar Now Cheaper than Coal

Jessica Hunt

Their mission: to deliver cost-efficient solar electricity. The Nanosolar company was founded in 2002 and is working to build the world's largest solar cell factory in California and the world's largest panel-assembly factory in Germany. They have successfully created a solar coating that is the most cost-efficient solar energy source ever. Their PowerSheet cells contrast the current solar technology systems by reducing the cost of production from $3 a watt to a mere 30 cents per watt. This makes, for the first time in history, solar power cheaper than burning coal. These coatings are as thin as a layer of paint and can transfer sunlight to power at amazing efficiency. Although the underlying technology has been around for years, Nanosolar has created the actual technology to manufacture and mass produce the solar sheets. The Nanosolar plant in San Jose, once in full production in 2008, will be capable of producing 430 megawatts per year. This is more than the combined total of every other solar manufacturer in the U.S.

Nano particles

Nanosolar, Inc. prides themselves on being the “Third Wave” of solar technology. The “First Wave” began over three decades ago with the introduction of silicon wafer based solar cells. This technology bore high material and production costs with poor capital efficiency. Silicon does not absorb light very well and therefore, the silicon wafers must be very thick. Also, the wafers are extremely fragile. Their need for intricate handling complicates processing all the way up to the final panel product. The “Second Wave” came about a decade ago with the first “thin-film” solar cells. This established that a cell 100 times thinner than the solar wafers can work just as well. However, this process also has its setbacks. First, the cells semiconductor was deposited using slow and expensive high-vacuum based processes. Secondly, the thin films were deposited directly on glass as a substrate. This eliminated the possibilities of:

  • Using a conductive substrate directly as electrode (The Nanosolar cells work on a metal foil substrate, or semiconductor, instead of the stainless steel or glass substrate. The metal foil semiconductor creates an increase in yield of 20%);
  • Achieving a low-cost top electrode of high performance (An electrode is a conductor through which electricity flows.);
  • Employing the yield and performance advantages of individual cell matching & sorting (The effect of electrical mismatch per cell leads to greater losses per panel as a result, and panel yield and efficiency distribution suffer: A bad cell results in a bad panel with thin-film-on-glass technology; but with a cell-sorting technology, only that cell will be a loss);
  • Employing high-yield continuous roll-to-roll processing (Roll-to-roll processing allows large quantities of material to be processed with equipment that leaves a small footprint);
  • Developing high-power high-current panels with lower balance-of-system cost {Nanosolar.com}. To put it simply, the production cost was still too high and the product did not yield a high enough output of energy.

Nanosolar, however, brings together the entire conjunction of all seven areas of innovation which delivers a dramatic improvement in cost efficiency, yield and throughput of the production of much thinner cells than ever before.

Nanosolar offers a 25 year warranty on its products. They test their products in much harsher conditions than the official certification standards. They expose the cells to intense UV light as well as intense humidity. This in depth testing allows for Nanosolar to produce a quality product with efficient output in all environments.

 

But, despite such advances, congress is trying to remove tax incentives for renewable energy....

On TV / Videos

CNBC: Sunshine in a Can

CNN: Global Challenges

History Channel: Modern Marvels

KQED: Solar City--The Future of Nanosolar

 Update: First Panels Now Shipping

Further Reading:

12 comments

If you see any unhelpful comments, please let us know immediately.

pedro pedrianes (anonymous)

I would like to have information on nanosolar panel for my house.

Written in September 2008

Tim (anonymous)

I think the 30c/W is projected rather than existing, hence the need for subsidies etc...

I hope it becomes real.

Written in September 2008

warren lilyea wlilyea@cox.net (anonymous)

i am serious about promoting solar energy and would like to know projected availability for residential

Written in October 2008

Pasha (anonymous)

I think it the next ten years we will see a true electromobile powered by the battery rechargeable from the solar energy.

Written in October 2008

Scepter Marketing Technologies (anonymous)

You can build your own <a href="http://free-renewable-energy.blogspot.com/" title="solar energy">solar energy</a> system for under $500.

Written in October 2008

Blargh (anonymous)

Finally. Energy crisis over, we can all go home.

Written in November 2008

Sunshine (anonymous)

"The Nanosolar plant in San Jose, once in full production in 2008, will be capable of producing 430 megawatts per year."

This statement makes no sense. "megawatts" is a measure of power, not energy. Power=Energy/Time, i.e. the more energy can be produced in a given amount of time, the higher the power. Conversely, a solar plant with a 430 MW max. power rating can put out an amount of energy per year that depends upon the amount of sunshine over a day during which the plant can produce at that capacity. Assuming (generously) that maximal power generation is possible for 5 hours per day for 365 days a year that would amount to 785 GWh per year.
At a cost of roughly $ 0.1 per kWh, that plant would generate a gross revenue of approx. $ 80 million per year.

Written in November 2008

I would like to knoe roughly the effeciency of nanosolar cell,I found differnt so far percentage,any one can tell me ?please
ganim27"hotmail.com
Thanks

Written in November 2008

again,what is the effeciancy of nanosolar cell?
ganim27@hotmail.com
Thanks

Written in November 2008

steve (anonymous)

is it feasible to roll and unroll a nanosolar
cell...let's say...once every eight hours for
ten years with little loss of efficency?

Written in November 2008

Reid (anonymous)

its good

Written last month

Ross (anonymous)

"This statement makes no sense. "megawatts" is a measure of power, not energy. "

It does make sense. The plant isn't making energy - it's making solar cells. The solar cells have a watt rating, which represents their peak power output. They're saying the plant is sufficient to produce enough cells each year to have a combined power rating of 430 megawatts.

Written last month

Add a comment
  • to get your picture next to your comment (not a member yet?).
  • (hint: logged in Celsias members don't have to fill in this)
  • Posted on Nov. 23, 2007. Listed in:

    See other articles written by Jessica »

    12 comments


    Pledge to do these related actions

    Turn off your vehicle on long waiting traffic signals, 156°

    When you need to wait on the long traffic signals, turn off your vehicles and ...

    Change almost all lightbulbs to low energy bulbs, 494°

    this should cut down energy usage. Plan to change the rest of the bulbs then ...

    We Need Clean Energy, Not Clean Coal!, 79°

    During the Vice Presidential debate, both Senator Biden and Governor Palin touting their support for ...

    Follow these related projects

    The Homestead

    West Central Wisconsin, United States

    Featured Companies & Orgs