Kunstler: Stop calling Americans “consumers”

Joseph Romm

I was at a small meeting on peak oil Friday — Executive Summary:  We’re peaking now!

James Kunstler, author of The Long Emergency, was there.  He is in the Mad Max/Lovelock/Wall-E school of dystopia, and so I have a number of disagreements with him (see “Why I don’t agree with James Kunstler about peak oil and the “end of suburbia“).

He did, however, say one thing that really strike a chord.  He said we should stop calling Americans “consumers.”  It pigeonholes all Americans and also becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

That seems to me a reasonable point, and I will endeavor to make a change.  Indeed, I had previously blogged that the U.S. savings rate was on the rise, it looks like U.S. carbon dioxide emissions peaked in 2007, President Obama was making a big ush toward making America a nation of creators as opposed to consumers, and I asked “Is the U.S. consumption binge over?

The figure above is from the NYT business blog, Economix, which has a longer-term, glass-is-half-empty perspective in a post titled, “Savings Rates Rising Toward Mediocrity“:

 

The Bureau of Economic Analysis announced that personal savings rates rose again in May. Americans saved 6.9 percent of their after-tax income last month, the highest rate in 15 years.

Is that impressive? Not particularly, at least in historical terms. In fact, it’s about equal to the average savings rate of the last 50 years:

Doh!

Well, I’m a glass-is-half-full type of person — or, rather, like my old friend Amory Lovins, I’m a glass-is-twice-as-big-as-it-needs-to-be person.  So rather than focusing on the past, I’ll stick with Obama’s optimism about the future from his big speech on science and R&D last month — “Our future on this planet depends on our willingness to address the challenge posed by carbon pollution,” vows “we will exceed [R&D] level achieved at the height of the space race”:

I want us all to think about new and creative ways to engage young people in science and engineering, whether it’s science festivals, robotics competitions, fairs that encourage young people to create and build and invent — to be makers of things, not just consumers of things.

I would also note that in Dale Carnegie’s uber-bestseller How to Win Friends and Influnce People, in Section Four “How to be a leader:  How to change people without giving offense or arousing resentment,” he has a chapter titled, “Give a Dog a Good Name.”  Bottom line:  People live up — or down — to expectations, and the naming of things matters.  [Yes, I know, calling ourselves "homo sapiens sapiens" didn't take.]

So, while it may just be a small thing, instead of using the term “American consumers,” I’ll just try to stick with “Americans.”

This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.  Joseph Romm is the editor of Climate Progress and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.

2 comments

If you see any unhelpful comments, please let us know immediately.

KieranMullen (anonymous)

How are these figures calculated? What liquid or semi liquid assets does it take into account? Many people have mortgages, what if they put money towards their mortgages (or credit card bills for that matter) instead of saving?

KieranMullen
http://360oregon.com

Written in July 2009

Steve A. 100°

I think what stands out most is the question "Since when did lack of spending become synonymous with saving?" If my income receeds, or the government decides to ramp up its printing of paper, which in effect causes the same situation, then it would stand to reason that I am not spending as much, however I would not be saving, but rather adjusting my lifestyle downwards in order to keep the kids fed. Add the level of debt carried by Americans and there is a whole other dimension to this, so the issue of relevance of savings comes to the front as well.

And I have never liked the "glass half full vs. glass half empty" analogy either when it is applied to situations involving simple math. The numbers are there regardless of perspective or feelings. This cliche gives far too much credence to perspective where little or none is due. Just give me the figures, methodology and tell me what your point is and I'll take it from there. Judging from friends, family and my own experience in the matter, I would say that savings aren't even in the ballpark yet. And even if they were, the relevance is diminished by the devaluation of our currency and loss of American advantage in industry. Seriously, it is going to take a very substantial miracle for Americans to somehow compete with 3rd world wages and disposable populations at any time in the foreseeable future.

Written in July 2009

Add a comment
  • to get your picture next to your comment (not a member yet?).
  • (hint: logged in Celsias members don't have to fill in this)
  • Posted on July 5, 2009. Listed in:

    2 comments


    Pledge to do these related actions

    Shop Locally, 31°

    Buy LOCAL ....food (produce and any other groceries possible), arts and crafts, services etc.

    What I own fits into a 1 meter by 2 meter space, 2°

    Have been nomadic for 50 years and own very few things

    Cover your pots while cooking, 1300°

    Doing so can save a lot of the energy needed for preparing the dish. Even ...

    Follow these related projects

    Carbon Reduction Action Groups

    Frederick, United States

    Featured Companies & Orgs