Coming Together on Climate Change and Poverty

Tackling climate change and reducing poverty are not mutually exclusive aims, according to a report released in the UK yesterday.

"For too long now, groups tackling poverty and protecting the environment have operated separately" begins the report ‘Tackling Climate Change, Reducing Poverty'. "The fact that climate change and poverty are connected, and must be tackled together, has not been sufficiently understood."

The report is the first from a roundtable consortium convened by the New Economics Foundation and including Oxfam and Friends of the Earth, with contributions from a range of community groups.

Poverty still affects the UK, with one in five people struggling to keep up with basic living costs. Climate change will affect these poorpeople first and hardest. With poorer housing, worse health and no insurance, they are more at risk from weather events and extremes of temperature. Since wealthy lifestyles account for a much larger percentage of CO2 emissions, but the poor suffer its effects considerably more, climate change is a matter of social justice as well as an environmental concern.

That's why it's important to prioritize actions that help fight climate change and reduce poverty at the same time, and the report gives plenty of examples. An obvious one is public transport. Car culture needs to be reined in through carbon taxing and so on, but it may mean that only the rich will be able to afford a car and the freedom that it represents. Investing in public transport would reduce the number of cars on the road and thus CO2 emissions, and would guarantee that those on lower incomes aren't denied the ability to travel in the process.

Household energy efficiency is another area where everybody wins. Insulation and energy saving light-bulbs reduce overall energy consumption, and save money on gas and electricity bills too. Household energy is particularly important, as one in six British households is classed as ‘fuel impoverished', including 23% of pensioners. Rising fuel prices are a major concern to these households, but they may lack the money to make improvements to their homes. Prioritizing efficiency avoids the difficult choice between reducing overall emissions by taxing energy use, and helping to solve the problem of energy poverty.

The London borough of Haringey took an innovative approach to this recently. By taking thermographic images of the area at night, they were able to pinpoint the houses that were losing the most heat, and target these with information about the various grants that were available to help householders insulate their homes.

The Bankside Open Spaces Trust models a further example. Based in central London in a high-density, low income area of housing, the trust worked with the community to create a Diversity Garden. Space has been set aside for growing vegetables and planting fruit trees, with additional space left for wildlife. Schools and community groups are able to grow vegetables in the garden, but more importantly, they learn the skills to grow their own food on whatever space they may have available, right down to window sills or tower block balconies. This provides community pride as well as healthier, cheaper food, and reduces food miles and CO2 emissions from industrial agriculture.

Finally, renewable energy presents twin opportunities to create jobs and develop skills. Germany has already done this, creating a quarter of a million jobs in renewable energy in recent years. Barack Obama has just promised to do the same in the US, announcing a plan to double alternative energy in three years and "put Americans to work" in the process. The UK is expected to announce a similar scheme very soon.

All these measures are UK based, or relevant primarily to the developed world. Climate justice is a bigger problem when viewed internationally, and a similar approach will be needed. The developed world will have to lead the way in reducing CO2 emissions, while ensuring that climate change targets do not prevent developing nations from combating poverty. Getting climate change and poverty groups to work together and find common ground will be vital as the world prepares for a replacement to Kyoto.

For more case studies and examples, download the Tackling Climate Change, Reducing Poverty report from

Related Reading:
Carbon Markets: What's in it for the Poor?
Where Do Climate Refugees Go When it Rains?

Image Credit:
Chris Tobias



If you see any unhelpful comments, please let us know immediately.

Steven Earl Salmony (anonymous)

Many thanks for speaking out loudly, clearly and often. Millions of voices are needed now more than ever before to support your efforts.

A jeremiad follows concerning wasting time and keeping silent while woefully inadequate leaders of the human community promulgate policies and initiate large-scale corporate activities that recklessly overheat and relentlessly ravage Earth and its environs.

My not-so-great generation of elders will likely be remembered as the perpetrators of the most perverse, self-serving silence in human history. No other generation has taken so much from this good Earth, threatened the very future of its own children and given so little of themselves to preserve life for coming generations. Photographs of us will disclose both our corpulence and hollowness.

Although the disclosure of truth is unsettling, hiding the truth from the human community could be a monstrous example of human-driven foolery, one that could soon lead to a colossal ecological wreckage.

To suppress the truth by conscientiously substituting whatsoever could somehow be true with willful silence is tantamount to the commission of a pernicious lie.

A widely shared and consensually validated determination among people with knowledge to maintain their silence, when remaining silent betrays intellectual honesty, conceals the truth and thwarts courageous action, is the most dangerous of all global threats to the family of humanity, life as we know it and the preservation of Earth as a fit place for human habitation.

From this perspective, perhaps we can begin to apprehend the actual, most formidable enemy of future human wellbeing and environmental health.

Steven Earl Salmony
AWAREness Campaign on the Human Population,
established 2001

Written in January 2009

Poverty in the UK is assessed through a number of indicators, including health, work, access to services such as bank accounts, quality of housing and so on. The 1 in 5 statistic is from the most commonly used indicator, and represents the percentage of people living on less than 60% of the average income.That would mean you were living on less than £16 a day after tax and housing costs. That's pretty low for the UK.

Written in January 2009

Add a comment
  • to get your picture next to your comment (not a member yet?).
  • Posted on Jan. 19, 2009. Listed in:

    See other articles written by Jeremy »


    Pledge to do these related actions

    Turn off car engine when ideling more than 10 seconds., 41°

    The idea that it takes more gas to start a car than to leave it ...

    Use a motorbike or scooter to get around, 32°

    OK we all know that it would be ideal if we could all walk or ...

    Stop Eating Unhealthy Food, 11°

    Fast Food is always full of chemical additives, meat from unknown sources.

    Featured Companies & Orgs