China's Coal-Power May Make Electric Vehicles More Polluting

Celsias

Electric cars have been heralded as environmentally friendly, but findings from University of Tennessee, Knoxville, researchers show that electric cars in China have an overall impact on pollution that could be more harmful to health than gasoline vehicles.

Chris Cherry, assistant professor in civil and environmental engineering, and graduate student Shuguang Ji, analyzed the emissions and environmental health impacts of five vehicle technologies in 34 major Chinese cities, focusing on dangerous fine particles. What Cherry and his team found defies conventional logic: electric cars cause much more overall harmful particulate matter pollution than gasoline cars.

“An implicit assumption has been that air quality and health impacts are lower for electric vehicles than for conventional vehicles,” Cherry said. “Our findings challenge that by comparing what is emitted by vehicle use to what people are actually exposed to. Prior studies have only examined environmental impacts by comparing emission factors or greenhouse gas emissions.”

Particulate matter includes acids, organic chemicals, metals, and soil or dust particles. It is also generated through the combustion of fossil fuels.

For electric vehicles, combustion emissions occur where electricity is generated rather than where the vehicle is used. In China, 85 percent of electricity production is from fossil fuels, about 90 percent of that is from coal. The authors discovered that the power generated in China to operate electric vehicles emit fine particles at a much higher rate than gasoline vehicles. However, because the emissions related to the electric vehicles often come from power plants located away from population centers, people breathe in the emissions a lower rate than they do emissions from conventional vehicles.

Still, the rate isn’t low enough to level the playing field between the vehicles. In terms of air pollution impacts, electric cars are more harmful to public health per kilometer traveled in China than conventional vehicles.

“The study emphasizes that electric vehicles are attractive if they are powered by a clean energy source,” Cherry said.”In China and elsewhere, it is important to focus on deploying electric vehicles in cities with cleaner electricity generation and focusing on improving emissions controls in higher polluting power sectors.”

Chris Cherry

Chris Cherry

The researchers estimated health impacts in China using overall emission data and emission rates from literature for five vehicle types—gasoline and diesel cars, diesel buses, e-bikes and e-cars—and then calculated the proportion of emissions inhaled by the population.

E-cars’ impact was lower than diesel cars but equal to diesel buses. E-bikes yielded the lowest environmental health impacts per passenger per kilometer.

“Our calculations show that an increase in electric bike usage improves air quality and environmental health by displacing the use of other more polluting modes of transportation,” Cherry said. “E-bikes, which are battery-powered, continue to be an environmentally friendly and efficient mode of transportation.”

The findings also highlight the importance of considering exposures and the proximity of emissions to people when evaluating environmental health impacts for electric vehicles. They also illuminate the distributional impact of moving pollution out of cities. For electric vehicles, about half of the urban emissions are inhaled by rural populations, who generally have lower incomes.

4 comments

If you see any unhelpful comments, please let us know immediately.

Electric automobiles need electricity to drive and producing all that electricity can offset any environmental benefit the automobiles are imagined to provide. Powering electric cars can really be worse than driving gas-powered vehicles. You may also read further: http://www.cardealexpert.com/news-information/fyi/envrionmental-electric-vehicles/

Written in February

Michael J. Schmitz (anonymous)

TATA MOTORS START BUILDING VEHICLES IN FACTORIES IN AUGUST OF 2011 THAT ARE FUELED ON THE SAME AIR WE BREATHE. MIKE

Written in February

Christian (anonymous)

It says that the findings defy conventional logic. They don't - unfortunately, the choice of words rather point at the low awareness and ability of too many people.
It's easy: If I pick an an apple from a tree and eat it to get energy, I get all the energy inside the apple and can use it well. But if the apple is grown far away, half of the energy in the apple will be used just by walking there, fetching it, and returning. So I'll need two apples. The pollution (for fertilizer etc) caused by the extra apple goes right out in the air, to little use. Transport of energy as such seldom improves much, and Electric Vehicles (EVs) are all too often a very good example of incomplete, counterproductive thinking.

And to Mike: Nothing is fueled on air. Also the Tata cars belong to the same category. Pollution is just shifted elsewhere. One of few positive things is that they (together with EVs) may be better at recuperating energy during braking etc.

Written in February

Christian (anonymous)

I agree, though, that e-bikes seem to be a really good idea. As long as they replace a car (or dirty 2-stroke scooter), they've got to be better looking both at consumption and pollution.

Written in February

Add a comment
  • to get your picture next to your comment (not a member yet?).
  • Posted on Feb. 16, 2012. Listed in:

    4 comments


    Pledge to do these related actions

    Buy a greener car!, 1°

    I know cars aren't particularly green but many of us HAVE to have a car ...

    Adopt a tree, 11°

    Forests are really important for life not just for man but also other flora and ...

    Use Blackle instead of google, 77°

    Google.com (excuse me for my reference to two other sites, but this is worth it), ...

    Follow these related projects

    Carbon Nation - climate change solutions documentary

    Louisville, Kentucky, United States

    Featured Companies & Orgs