A Potemkin Village of Ice

A. Siegel

As reported recently in the Washington Post, the cold winter has lead to more Artic ice than has been seen for several years, “maximum sea ice extent in March increased by 3.9 percent over that of the previous three years.” Wow. Global Warming is done and we need to fear the ice?

Well, first off, “climate” is not measured in three years: “the total ice coverage was still 2.2 percent below the long-term average.”

Even more interestingly, is the look and consideration of long-duration ice coverage. “The very old ice, which remains in the Arctic for at least six years, made up more than 20 percent of the Arctic in the mid to late 1980s, but by this winter it had decreased to 6 percent.” As one scientist noted,
It’s a facade, like a Hollywood set. There’s no building behind it.

A Potemkin Village of ice coverage.

“Long-lasting ice,” the ice that might stay around a decade or longer, has dropped dramatically. “... the percentage of the Arctic Ocean with this stable ice cover has decreased from more than 50 percent in the mid-1980s to less than 30 percent as of last month.”

But, that facade, that Potemkin Village, helps feed the denier/skeptic community’s truthiness sound machine.

“Because we had a cold winter, the public might think things have gotten better,” said Walter Meier of the National Snow and Ice Data Center at the University of Colorado at Boulder. “In fact, the loss of the perennial ice makes clear that they’re not getting better at all.”
Yes, a weather pattern does not prove, disprove, or disrupt long-term climate change. The Globe is warming and we’re seeing the impacts, even if a day or a winter might be colder than one in the past.

Now, in this article, there is an interesting confusing statement.

Officials said the loss of long-lasting ice was less the result of warming of the atmosphere than of a long-term rise in ocean temperatures …
Guess what, the two are combined. “Global Warming” includes the warming of earth and of the ocean. The ocean is a carbon-dioxide and heat sink. Without warming of the atmosphere, would there be warming of the oceans?

NOTE: Ice is a hot topic nowadays. See, for example, Andrew Revkin yesterday, A Farewell to Ice discussing the melting of glaciers.

Editor's Addition: Just to add to Siegel's post, the following chart from the National Climatic Data Center gives a good visual representation of how localised colder climate conditions do not a cooling globe make. Note that local conditions can make some areas cooler in a particular year, but it's important to look at global averages and trends. Warming is by far the predominant trend.

And below we have 2008 data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) website:

The combined global land and ocean surface temperature was the 16th warmest on record for the December 2007-February 2008 period -- NOAA (emphasis added)

This is despite "[t]he presence of a moderate-to-strong La Niña", a seasonal cooling phenomenon you can read about here.

Further Reading:

Add a comment
  • to get your picture next to your comment (not a member yet?).
  • (hint: logged in Celsias members don't have to fill in this)
  • Posted on March 23, 2008. Listed in:

    See other articles written by Adam »


    Pledge to do these related actions

    Get rid of the dishwasher, 151°

    Out of the Homestead we got rid of of the old dishwasher right away. They ...

    Celebrate Earth Day on the National Mall with 1Sky!, 1°

    Come celebrate Earth Day this Sunday, April 19 with 1Sky, live music, environmental leaders, and ...

    I heart clean energy, 1°

    This Valentines day, show your leaders in Washington why you care about a clean energy ...

    Follow these related projects

    Change the World for Fifteen Bucks

    NZ, Australia and the UK, United Kingdom

    Featured Companies & Orgs