I’ve decided I need a bit of a break. I quite fancy seeing more of Europe, so first I am flying to Ireland for a few days, then to Sweden and Norway. I’m looking forward to it.
These three return flights from London have cost me about $12 because the airline is kindly offering to pay my passenger tax. It costs me more than that to take my kids to the swimming pool for an hour. Isn’t that fantastic?
One of the great low-cost flight innovators is Stelios Haji-Iannou of Easyjet. He developed the idea of yield management for air travel. Basically the price of the seat is determined by the demand, so booking in advance is much cheaper than at the last minute. It is an effective and profitable model which has been exported to all parts of the world.
Of course, we all know that this has had a dramatic effect on greenhouse gas emissions.
Cheap flights, globalisation and the mounting cost of train travel have made aviation by far the fastest growing source of carbon dioxide in the UK.
Emissions from UK aviation have increased by nearly 70% since 1990 and rose by 11% in 2004 alone. While they amount to less than 3% of national carbon emissions, expected growth will nearly double this within 25 years. — Guardian
You may well be wondering what my European trip has to do with Celsias and carbon reduction.
Well, the answer is that I’m not going on a European trip. Yes, I’ve bought the flights, but I am not going to use them.
For one thing, by buying the cheapest fares, I’m inflating the prices for everyone else. If the flights are more expensive, then maybe people would have second thoughts about using them as cheap public service transportation.
For another, the cheap airlines make money by charging for ‘extras‘ such as luggage, food and check-in counters. If I’m not there, the only money they’ve made from me is the $12, which barely covers processing my card details.
And, before anyone says so, yes I appreciate that my vigilante efforts are going to have a limited effect on a multi-billion dollar industry. But, imagine the effect if a large group of committed environmentalists bought all of the cheapest tickets when an airline had a cheap offer, and then refused to fly. Airlines would eventually see the effect on their bottom line of flying planes with fewer paying passengers; airports might have to close, people might eventually drift back to more sustainable forms of transportation. As well as penalising airlines for flying empty aircraft, we need to make those that do fly considerably less profitable.
The other great advantages are that it is perfectly legal and almost undetectable. What would happen if a large group checked-in online and then did not turn up to the aircraft?
Imagine if an underground movement managed to reshape the airline industry. Wouldn’t that be an accomplishment?
view Celsias projects related to this topic >>


March 19th, 2008
I’m not sure I agree with the whole don’t fly movement. I think there are real benefits to traveling. It gives people an appreciation of the larger world around them, not just the little bubble where they live.
Do you also advocate not driving? Flying uses more co2, but driving uses more fuel. So is it a wash?
March 19th, 2008
How about a version of this, in a different way.
When deciding to travel, especially in “cheap” airlines, why not buy multiple seats. Thus, you get leg room while also buying down the travel miles.
On the other hand, I truly don’t see this type of movement have long-term or major impact. Sigh …
March 19th, 2008
Oh, yes, that makes perfect sense.
You do realize that they oversell, yes? You’ve just given them $12 for free, no work needed. And, as an added bonus for them, you’re raising the price they can charge everyone else, making them far more money long-term.
In fact, you’re actually sponsoring other people to fly. You’re helping the very people you apparently despise.
The best way to do this is not buying. If you buy, you create supply. It’s like trying to prevent trade in endangered species by buying all the rhino horn and ivory you can…
March 19th, 2008
Oh my gosh! Your protest is only one day old and it’s already working!
EasyJet shares plummet on profit warning
March 20th, 2008
Thanks for the comments.
Bryan - there are undoubtedly cultural positives from globalisation, although the majority of those are benefits to the rich rather than the poor. But in a situation where we are on the verge of catastrophic climate change, we have to ask ourselves whether we can truly afford cheap flights. I don’t want to be the one explaining to future generations that we trashed the planet to go and lie on a beach for two weeks.
A Seigel - Good thinking.
Justin George - Actually, I doubt that the low-cost airlines do oversell. What happens is that they charge a high price for seats sold at the last minute so can fill the spaces left by no-shows. If I leave the airline guessing until the very last minute (by checking-in online) there is little opportunity to sell the extra seats. And anyway, if a lot of people bought cheap seats, there would simply not be enough last minute customers to fill the plane. I have no idea about bank charges in the USA, but $12 in the UK probably barely covers the fee to charge my debit card for three transactions. The airline is getting a very marginal benefit from me - if anything at all. As I explained above, the profits are not made from ticket sales but extras.
tidal - good news, although I can’t take credit for that one as my tickets are not for easyjet!