by Linn Cohen-Cole
Dear Hillary,
By polling logic, I should be your supporter - Democrat, older woman, white, liberal. I was even in a dorm with you in college. I have pulled for you for years. But something this past summer fundamentally changed my responsibility to my children and grandchildren. In the time I have left in my life to protect them and others, I need to speak out.
I saw a News Hour piece on Maharastra, India, about farmers committing suicide [see here and here]. Monsanto, a US agricultural giant, hired Bollywood actors for ads telling illiterate farmers they could get rich (by their standards) from big yields with Monsanto’s Bt (genetically engineered) cotton seeds. The expensive seeds needed expensive fertilizer and pesticides (Monsanto, again) and irrigation. There is no irrigation there. Crops failed. Farmers had larger debt than they’d ever experienced.
And farmers couldn’t collect seeds from their own fields [see here and here] to try again (true since time immemorial). Monsanto “patents” their DNA-altered seeds as “intellectual property.” They have a $10 million budget and a staff of 75 devoted solely to prosecuting farmers [here]. Since the late 1990s (about when industrial agriculture took hold in India), 166,000 Indian farmers have committed suicide and 8 million have left the land.
Farmers in Europe, Asia, Africa, Indonesia,South America, Central America and here, have protested Monsanto and genetic engineering for years.
What does this have to do with you?
You have connections to Monsanto through the Rose Law Firm where you worked and through Bill who hired Monsanto people for central food-related roles. Your Orwellian-named “Rural Americans for Hillary” was planned withTroutman Sanders, Monsanto’s lobbyists.
Genetic engineering and industrialized food and animal production all come together at the Rose Law Firm, which represents the world’s largest GE corporation (Monsanto), GE’s most controversial project (DP&L’s - now Monsanto’s - terminator genes) [here], the world’s largest meat producer (Tyson), the world’s largest retailer and a dominant food retailer (Wal-Mart) [here].
The inbred-ness of Rose’s legal representation of corporations which own controlling interests in other corporations there and of corporate boards sharing members who are also shareholders of each other’s corporations there, is so thorough that it is hard to capture. Jon Jacoby, senior executive of the Stephens Group - one of the largest institutional shareholders of Tyson Foods, Walmart, DP&L - is also Chairman of the Board of DP&L and arranged the Wal-Mart deal. Jackson Stephens’ Stephens Group staked Sam Walton and financed Tyson Foods. Monsanto bought DP&L. All represented at Rose.
You didn’t just work there, you made friends. That shows in the flow of favors then and since. You were invited onto Walmart’s board, you were helped by a Tyson executive to make commodity trades (3 days before Bill became governor), netting you $100,000, Jackson Stephens strongly backed Bill for Governor, and then for President (donating $100,000).
Food and friends, in Clinton terms: Bill’s appointed friend Mike Espy, Secretary of Agriculture, who immediately significantly weakened federal chicken waste and contamination standards, opening the door to major expansion of Tyson’s chicken factory farms. Espy resigned, indicted for accepting bribes, illegal contributions, money laundering, illegal dispersal of USDA subsidies, …. Tyson Foods was the largest corporate offender.
But what Bill did for Monsanto “genetic engineering” goes beyond inadequate concepts of giving corporate friends influence: He unleashed genetic engineering into the world. And then he helped close off people’s escape from it.
Genetic engineering is many orders of magnitude different from “normal” (even polluting) business in its potential biologic ramifications. The warning myth of Pandora’a Box - letting irretrievable things rush out into nature - has become real. The harrowing change to the world from nuclear fission and fusion is the closest parallel.
What did Bill do?
1. Bill’s put Monsanto people in at the FDA, as US Agricultural Trade Representatives, on International Biotechnology Consultive Forums, and more … (http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/072600-03.htm) or http://www.monitor.net/monitor/9904b/monsantofda.html or http://www.mindfully.org/GE/Revolving-Door.htm
2. Bill’s FDA gave Monsanto permission to market rBGH (a GE bovine growth hormone), the first genetically engineered product let loose on us (or did tomatoes with fish DNA get there first?).
3. Despite reports of bovine illness and death, Bill’s FDA did not recall it or put warnings on it. Even “a very angry, very vocal nationwide consumer base” had no impact.
4. Bill’s FDA wouldn’t even label rBGH as “present” in milk.
5. When dairy farmers tried to label their own milk rBGH-free so the public could choose [more on rBGH and labelling here], Bill’s USDA threatened all dairies that their products could be confiscated from stores. Michael Taylor, USFDA Deputy Commissioner, was formerly Monsanto’s counsel.
6. How were consumers to protect their family, given Bill’s FDA enforced public blindness, except to buy only organic? But Bill’s FDA tried to close off that last escape, proposing to include in “organic” standards, “the dirty three” a: genetic engineering of plants and animals, use of irradiation in food processing and use of municipal sewage sludge as a fertilizer. The FDA backed down.
Had this gone through, Monsanto could have finally labeled rBGH milk … as “organic.” And animal waste from factory farms, a pollution nightmare for Tyson and others, could have been sold as fertilizer.
USDA head Dan Glickman: “This is probably the largest public response to an [Agriculture Department] rule in modern history.” In fact the response was 20 times greater than anything ever before proposed by the USDA.
Personally, I resent years of effort to protect my children and now grandchildren, from that crap.
Politically, Bill sided against small farmers and against the public’s right to know, and with Monsanto.
A snap shot of our food:
Oils: Sheep died in India after feeding on Bt cotton fields. We feed our children Bt cotton, as cottonseed oil in peanut butter and cookies.
Grains: 49% of US corn acreage was planted in Bt corn in 2007. A French study proved Monsanto’s GMO corn causes kidney and liver toxicity.
Soft drinks and candy have highly concentrated Bt corn, in the form of high fructose Bt corn syrup. The US food system depends most on two crops, soy (90% GMO, 90% of traits owned by Monsanto) and corn, the largest crop (60% GMO, nearly 100% Monsanto traits). “[E] ssentially our entire food supply is genetically modified, to the benefit of one company.” The Grocery Manufacturers of America in 2000 estimated that 70 percent of US food contains GM traits.
Meat: Steroids bulk up atheletes. Monsanto steroids bulk up animals - more weight, more profit. We feed our children steroids in meats. Is this why our children are fattening, like Hansel and Gretel?
Poultry: Bill’s USDA weakened chicken waste and contamination standards and attempted to allow sewage sludge as fertilize crops. I will say more about disease from industrialized poultry farms waste, at the end of this letter.
Milk: Over 30 scientific publications have shown increased levels of IGF-1 in milk with rBGH increases risks of breast cancer by up to seven-fold, also increasing colon and prostate cancers risks. Canada, 29 European nations, Norway, Switzerland, Japan, New Zealand, Australia, and South Africa ban U.S. rBGH dairy products. Bill’s USFDA put no restrictions, no warning labels (not allowing labels at all).
American children eat that food and drink that milk, Hillary. Coincidentally, American children are increasingly fat and sick.
Here, Bill ignored pleas for labeling. Abroad, Bill ignored intense international objections over the same issue - unlabeled US food exports - badly straining trading relations. Monsanto’s “good ole boy,” he betrayed American families at the deepest levels conceivable - their family’s health and their democratic right to know. He betrayed our rural life and American family farmers - backing corporation deceit and control, over honesty and clean farming.
But, Hillary, it is one thing to not label a regular ‘ole food product to sell it, and quite another to sell a suspected-dangerous food product (rBGH), but Bill’s administration didn’t label (or stop) a well-known, terrifying threat - Mad Cow Disease.
Bill’s FDA’s August, 1997 regulation permitted “known TSE-positive [Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy] material to be used in pet food, pig, chicken and fish feed,” only requiring the label to read “Do not feed to cattle and other ruminants” in the US.
Monsanto added to the problem. “There is evidence that rbST use [Monsanto’s GE bovine growth hormone] reduces the useful lifespan of a dairy cow. … Given that the incubation period for BSE is at least three to five years and perhaps longer, rbST-treated cows could harbor “hidden” BSE. That is, they might be infected but still asymptomatic when sent to slaughter.” http://www.consumersunion.org/food/bgh-codex.htm
Bill let TSE into our entire food chain. And who owned the feed and slaughter and genetic engineering corporations which benefitted?
Please, tell me, Hillary, what he could possibly have gotten in friendship or favors, that could ever justify his exposing millions of people to this?
With genetic engineering itself, Bill did something to the whole world, which tried to object. Words are inadequate to express how astoundingly immoral, beyond human bounds and conceit and power, that was.
“Even for the biggest “winners,” it is like winning at poker on the Titanic.” Jerry Mander: Facing the Rising Tide
He had no right
Do you hear that?
Bill had sex from Monica Lewinsky. That’s “dinky immoral.” That’s chicken feed immoral - excuse the Tyson pun, excuse the TSE-laced pun. Bill let genetic engineering lose on NATURE itself.
Our way of life is likely to be more fundamentally transformed in the next several decades than in the previous one thousand years…Tens of thousands of novel transgenic bacteria, viruses, plants and animals could be released into the Earth’s ecosystems…Some of those releases, however, could wreak havoc with the planet’s biospheres. — Jeremy Rifkin, Biotech Century
Bill did this to us, like it was some nothing and he, some big dumb ass Southern boy, just smiling and getting in good with the Big Boys, thinking about as much about the consequences of something this immense and about us human beings out here, as he thought about you, when he was unfaithful with Monica. Just one big fool getting off on the power and used to getting away with things.
Terminator genes, developed by DP&L, a Rose Firm client, prevent seeds from “working” after only one season. Farmers “must” repurchase (patents and suing not certain enough control, it seems). Those “killing” genes pose the apocalyptic risk of breaking out into nature. Natural seeds could fail, too. Nature could fail.
Far-fetched?
GMO fields are already contaminating normal species Berkeley Professor of Microbiology, Ignacio Chapela, wrote an open letter, warning the Mexican government about just this breaking out phenomenon happening in maize
And it has already happened with weeds - pesticide resistant GMO seeds break lose and weeds become pesticide-resistant Superweeds. [here]
But Bill’s USDA spokesman, Willard Phelps said the USDA wanted the technology to be `widely licensed and made expeditiously available to many seed companies.’
Genetic Engineering is often justified as a human technology, one that feeds more people with better food. Nothing could be further from the truth. With very few exceptions, the whole point of genetic engineering is to increase sales of chemicals and bio-engineered products to dependent farmers. — David Ehrenfield: Professor of Biology, Rutgers University [also see previous link]
Hillary, one third of the world’s bee colonies have collapsed [here]. Gone. Farmers in India are killing themselves. Farmers and bees. Since organic farmers in India are fine and organic farmers report no colony collapse [here], what does these farming catatrophes say about “industrial agriculture” [here]
Mad Cow Disease is another direct result of industrial agriculture. And now ……. transnational poultry factories are implicated as the source of bird flu [here]. Small scale poultry farms and wild birds seem not to be the problem [just as small farmers are not the issue in Mad Cow Disease], and yet “initiatives are multiplying to ban outdoor poultry, squeeze out small producers and restock farms with genetically modified chickens. … http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/feb2006/2006-02-27-01.asp “Of the few outbreaks that did occur in [Laos], more than 90% broke out in commercial poultryoperations, not free-ranging flocks.”
Monsanto (and others) is currently working with the USDA to force small farmers to tag every animal with a global tracking device (NAIS - National Animal Identification System). Allegedly related to food safety, Monsanto and others would be creating a vast corporate digital library on every move of small farmers’ livestock.
But small farmers do not create the contaminated environments, do not supply the feed, do not grind up diseased animals into feed (how Mad Cow began) and then sell it. In fact, their farming methods, free range and small scale, are significantly healthier and safer for animals and food than the massive concentration of animals by corporate industrial agriculture.
Monsanto is also aggressively pushing for state laws to limit farmers’ right to choose what to plant and the public’s right to exclude GE plants from their communities.
Cattle bloated by steroids, lapse and loss of 10,000 year old normal seeds [here], immense pollution from factory farms [here], deadly-disease-ridden feed, world-wide bee colony collapse, poisoned soil and depleted water supplies, Superweeds, lawsuits against farmers, loss of family farms, and … India farmers killing themselves in what may be the largest mass suicide in recorded human history (on average … one farmer suicide every 30 minutes since 2002 - The Hindu 1.30.08) - that is industrial agriculture.
Monsanto and Tyson are two of the largest industrial agricultural corporations in the world. Industrial agriculture is represented by your Rose Law Firm.
Your claim to care about food safety is terrifying double-speak given what Bill did and who you take donations from. Your idea of a Department of Food Safety would centralize control of food - in whose corporate connected hands? You talk tough about labeling food - ah, but “foreign” food - a sleight of hand tricking a public desperate for safe US food. You talk about food safety but Bill degraded food in every imaginable way and prevented minimally sane labeling.
I am a person before I am a woman. Your gender means nothing. It is a media distraction. Your policies on health and food and women and children, are meaningless in the face of connections that have threatened those groups profoundly, connections you have never denounced.
Monsanto uses child labor in India, primarily very young girls, exposing them to a lethal pesticide 13-14 hours a day, for pennies in pay. But you take donations from their lobbyists. You say you care about black people but as the poorest people in this country, they are least able to buy organic and are forced to eat the contaminated foods Bill let into our food system. The National Black Farmers Association has a boycott out on all Monsanto products.
Do you eat organic?
So, who are you with, hapless black consumers and black farmers, or Monsanto? Mothers left to give their children rBGH milk, or Monsanto? Women exposed to 7 times greater risk of breast cancer, or Monsanto? Desperate farmers in India and young children forced into child labor in cottonseed factories there, or Monsanto? Animals suffering [here] from lives in filthy cages and disgusting feedlots, shot up with steroids and hormones and antibiotics, or Monsanto? Our children who eat candy with high fructose Bt corn syrup associated with kidney and liver toxicity, or Monsanto?
Edwards was right about your corporate connections. I just didn’t understand until I saw that PBS show and read about Monsanto, how personally affected my children and grandchildren, and all people around the world, have been.
I will not vote for you. I will vote for someone who will commit themselves to work on behalf of small farmers and real food and decent treatment of animals and to end this industrialized agricultural nightmare that is taking us off a cliff.
Linn Cohen-Cole, Atlanta
Disclaimer: I am not a scientist. I have read for months on this subject, and am including only a tiny portion of the horrifying things I have learned. I am expressing my opinion as person and may be wrong. Perhaps things are swell out there and rBGH is fabulous and TSE-laced feed is great, and genetic engineering is the best thing since manna. But I am scared for my family and I have not only a right to say so but an obligation to do so. I am angry that Monsanto was allowed the influence it had and has done the things it definitely seems to have. I am disgusted by industrialization of every tender and beautiful part of our world and hope, for all our children’s sake, we are not too late to pull back.
view Celsias projects related to this topic >>


February 19th, 2008
Brilliant Linn, simply brilliant.
February 19th, 2008
The links and relationships regarding industry and The Clintons is confusing, and would be an interesting diagram.
I’d be willing to help, feel free to email me.
February 20th, 2008
Thank you very much for this!!!
February 20th, 2008
Let me know what I can do. I’ve been reading about this for years. Very concerned! And angry!!
February 20th, 2008
Especially in a presidential election year and just when Hillary is one of the other party’s aspirants.
Hum, hum! Is there a link? Of course these things occur, have ocurred and shall continue to occur but to blame Bill and Hillary as if they were the primary culprits.Lady, take the lumber out of both your eys, announce you plan to vote Republican whilst the American Empire continues to flounder due to these incompetents (Democrat and Republican).
Excuse me if I am extremely skeptical but we are not naive. Maybe you think of repeating so many times this story that people will begin to believe in it, just like The Elders of Zion fabrication. Stop deluding others and be content in deluding yourself.
February 20th, 2008
Even though you and I are the types that wouldn’t get along: you having a hyphenated last name - to me the HEIGHT of ludicrous cross-contaminated, misunderstood Feminism and being a W grad….but this is a great piece and well-written.
February 20th, 2008
STOP HERE FOR A SECOND, folks. Really. Take a deep breath, then go back and re-read the article, keeping note of how many times BILL CLINTON is mentioned/blamed in the article. Or, better yet, I will save you the trouble of re-reading…just chew on this part:
“Bill did this to us, like it was some nothing and he, some big dumb ass Southern boy, just smiling and getting in good with the Big Boys, thinking about as much about the consequences of something this immense and about us human beings out here, as he thought about you, when he was unfaithful with Monica. Just one big fool getting off on the power and used to getting away with things.”
Hmmm. Now ask yourself, can you really extend the actions of this man to Hillary? Who is this article REALLY about, after all? If you would willingly hold Hillary responsible for the Monsanto dealings, why not for the Lewinsky affair as well? Pure absurdity.
Oh, and just for the record…the author says:
“I am a person before I am a woman. Your gender means nothing. It is a media distraction. ”
I don’t buy it. You don’t mention it unless it matters. Gender always matters, like it or not.
I for one am not willing to pin Bill’s dirty dealings on Hillary. Call me crazy, but I believe he is the one who pushed around the cigar(s)…both metaphorically and literally.
February 21st, 2008
I thought the campaign slogan was buy one get one free
February 21st, 2008
Sooo, this article is essentially saying we shouldn’t vote for Hillary because of a select kind of policy and an indiscretion of her husband.
How disappointing that the writer of such a well informed article would make such a sexist judgement. Have you confirmed that Hillary is proposing similar policies in regards to food regulation as that of her husband? It doesn’t look like it.
February 22nd, 2008
Globalism, thinning the herd, why are people shocked at this. Our shepards have been doing this for 1000’s of years, technology is just catching up to their agenda.
The original Empire figured out long ago exactly how many people were acceptable for management, the way farmers know how many cattle, shepards how many sheep they can manage on their land. Look at farming in a global vision, we are the animals on the farm.
Tim
February 22nd, 2008
Thank you SO much Linn for putting this all together. I knew some of this, but learned much more from the research you did in preparing this article. I have started to be a much choosier consumer over the last few years and have been able to find places to shop and things to watch out for that I can share with anyone who wishes to have that information. Just email me at: mrslabel@yahoo.com Please put “wellness information” in the subject line so that I can give your email immediate attention.
Virginia
February 23rd, 2008
to whom this may concern. if obama is nominated for president,shouldt he have to swear on the holy bible?
i think he should. what has happened to our country. what a mess. sincerly.
shirley palmer.
February 25th, 2008
As a person completely uninformed about the toxins in food, I find the information very compelling. This article really shouldn’t have been about the Clintons at all, but about informing the public. I am not as concerned with whose fault it is as I am thinking “Holy Cow, that’s in my food!?” And I wasn’t planning on voting for Clinton anyway. It is up to us to decide what to do with the information, whether it’s writing letters to our congressmen, voting differently, or just shopping differently.
Geez…….and I thought I was doing well by reading the ingredients on the package.
February 28th, 2008
Excellent information. Thank you Linn for all the time it took to research and write.
My question is why isn’t there more outrage about the adulteration of our food supply? Why do the voters keep sending the same old people back to Congress to continue back room deals? Most of the folks that go to Washington are not the brightest bulb on the block. They just had the means and phrases to get elected. I bet most cannot tell you the details of all the bills they have backed. Yet the voters send them back year, after year, after year.
We all have a responsiblity to watch our “reprentatives” voting record. How many of you watch C-Span when Congress is in session? You would be shocked and disappointed to witness how ill-informed our “representatives” are. But are YOU calling and writing them? If we want things to change, it must begin with our actions.
So how will your actions tomorrow be different than today? Will you find the email address, phone and fax number of your representatives? Will you start calling, emailing, writing them about your concerns? Will you start calling talk radio and voicing your concerns? Will you start commenting consistently on blogs? Any change begins with us, the voters!
I recently took a stand and became very involved against the GA Dept of Agriculture’s attempt to force the addition of charcoal chemical coloring agents to pet milk in the fall of last year. Pet milk is raw milk, or the what farmers have been drinking from the beginning of time. Talk about back room deals with big food corporations? The adulteration of our food is happening in every state-you all are just sleeping through it.
You better do your research and you better get informed. It’s is your responsibility after all and obviously you have access to the internet so there is no excuses. Don’t tell me you don’t know what to do. Start calling your representatives and tell them your feelings about what is being done to the food supply is not right and how their idiot, back room decisions are wrong.
If they don’t listen, THEN DO NOT RE-ELECT THEM! Get involved-and stop whinning that you don’t know what to do. Pick up the phone and make your voices heard! If you don’t, then our food won’t be worth eating.
The people have the power, now use it!!
February 28th, 2008
Melissa and woman with a hyphenated last name. You’re right that we shouldn’t blame Bill’s mess on Hillary. However, her track record with Big Agriculture isn’t looking much better:
a. She appointed Joy Phillipi, former president of a the National Pork Producers Council — the main trade group representing nasty CAFO operators — as the co-chair of Rural Americans for Hillary.
b. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, during the 2007-2008 election cycle, she was the #1 senate recipient of donations from all of the following industries: agribusiness, food and beverages, food processing and sales, food stores, crop production, sugar cane and sugar beets, restaurants and drinking establishments, and lobbyists
c. Her campaign recently held a “Rural Americans for Hillary” lunch and campaign briefing at the Washington, DC offices of Troutman Sanders, the lobbying firm of agribusiness giant Monsanto.
The connections go on, and it’s very, very grim.
February 29th, 2008
Thank you for a well written article.
If people had ALL the facts we never would have had a Bush or a Clinton for President. We get mesmerized by the media in the left vs right thing, meanwhile we get screwed by either one.
It’s Government by corporation, doesn’t matter if it’s Hillary, Obama or McCain…government by corporation is what we’ll have.
Register independent, think, don’t look for your television to give you the right answers.
Depending on which channel you view, you’ll get their version only. Do you know which corporation owns your selected media ? You might be surprised to know who benefits from war and who owns certain broadcast outlets…
Hillary was supported by the owner of Fox News
in a semi secret fund raiser…yes that very conservative Fox news…
Did you know the United States has the highest prison population in the world? We practice government sanctioned torture, start wars (for oil), and only the rich or those hand picked by the rich can be President…tired of all that?
My preference won’t be the next President, but he’s started a peaceful Revolution and if enough people wake up MAYBE we can save this country. Later this year there will be a march on Washington DC…be a part of it or watch your country dissolve, piece by piece.
go to - Ron Paul for President 2008 even if you don’t agree with everything he says check it out, sometimes the truth hurts.
April 9th, 2008
I wonder why this horrible thing that happened about ten years ago wasn’t brought to our attention earlier? How could you keep this a secret for 10 years? Why didn’t you call for Bill’s impeachment? Instead, you report this in the middle of one of the hardest fought contests for the democratic nomination between Obama and Clinton. What a coincidence. Coincidence?
How about some equal time and reporting the corporte connections to Obama. you can start with Tony Rezko and then continue with the nuclear industry.
Then look to the future. Edwards and Clinton have the best Universal Health Care plans. Obama’s is the republican plan.
Monsanto is an enemy to the people, there is no doubt of that. But I suspect a political motivation for waiting ten years to tell the story. I don’t think Clinton was a horribly unique politician with corporate connections. it is a cancer that infects every politician from Jimmy Carter and the trilateral Commission to Al Gore and Jack Quinn. And if you want to pin Bill’s failures on Hillary (you even figured out a way to mention Lewinsky in the letter), how about giving her credit for the decreasing number of people in poverty under Clinton and the booming economy?
April 9th, 2008
brian macleod said:”you want to pin Bill’s failures on Hillary (you even figured out a way to mention Lewinsky in the letter), how about giving her credit for the decreasing number of people in poverty under Clinton and the booming economy”.
Got your facts jumbled Brian. The reason poverty was reduced was the REPUBLICAN CONGRESS forced it. More Americans have worked under Bush (lower unemployement rate than ever under Clinton) and more prosperity. Get over it. It’s not that folks like Obama so much, I think it is that he’s NOT Hillary. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, MOSTLY DEMOCRATS, DO NOT LIKE HER. She’s not raising the money and she lies. For all of Obama’s shortcoming, the best drawing card for most dems is that he’s NOT Hillary. The American people DO NOT TRUST her. But she still thinks she is entitled to it. The thought of those two crooked, self absorbed people living in the “people’s house” again makes my skin crawl. Bill Clinton should have had as much class as the former govenor of New York that just resigned. Bill Clinton took advantage of Monica and continued to put this country through a most PUBLIC distasteful sex scandal. It depends on what the definition of “is-is”? And don’t forget he LIED under oath. And Hillary never said he was wrong to have lied under oath. They have no honesty or ethics. They are TWO of a kind. They always want us think they are “victims” of the vast right wing conspiracy. They do not take responsibility for ANY of their actions. They are always the victims of something. Hillary never has told the American People that Bill lyging under oath was WRONG. All she was mad about was that he got caught.
Americans have been down in the gutter with the Clinton’s. Been there, done that. American will have voted soon, and Hillary, it’s time for you to go and let the country move foward, without you or Bill, forever and ever. Amen.
April 10th, 2008
Hi expert.
You told me to get my facts straight, but actually you challenge my explanation rather than my facts. You agree that poverty decreased under Clinton (I suppose you are also aware that it has increased under GW Bush during the years when there was a republican congress and a republican executive). Explaining the reasons why these things happen is very difficult. People tend to want to claim that it was the responsibility of their party if its a good and the other party if its bad.
Perhaps this little excerpt from wiki might explain why the decrease in poverty occurred:
“In August 1993, Clinton signed the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, which passed Congress without a Republican vote. It cut taxes for fifteen million low-income families, made tax cuts available to 90% of small businesses,[41] and raised taxes on the wealthiest 1.2% of taxpayers.[42] Additionally, through the implementation of spending restraints, it mandated the budget be balanced over a number of years.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton#Presidency.2C_1993.E2.80.932001
Anyhow if that’s the only “fact” in what I wrote that you disagree with, then I don’t really care. The point I was trying to make is that while the core of the story may be true, because Bill Clinton supports GMF, the fact that it is coming out now and that Lewinsky is thrown into the story even though she has nothing to do with GMF, shows that this is an Obama propoganda piece. It is a story that happened ten years ago, but it came out now?
Obama has suffered equally with the Reverend Wright attack he has endured.
no one side has a monopoly on being bought off, nor do they have a nmonopoly on being unfairly attacked. even george Bush had to endure having his daughters behavior made an issue.
That doesn’t excuse it, but this is a propaganda piece for Obama.
Oh, if you don’t believe me on the Bush poverty stats, here’s a refernce. i can get more detailed info if necessary: “The number of Americans living in severe poverty has expanded dramatically under the Bush administration, with nearly 16 million people now living on an individual income of less than $5,000 (£2,500) a year or a family income of less than $10,000, according to an analysis of 2005 official census data.
The analysis, by the McClatchy group of newspapers, showed that the number of people living in extreme poverty had grown by 26 per cent since 2000. ”
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0227-02.ht
April 17th, 2008
Suspected as much. To separate Bill and Hill is foolishness. Clintons-no good then, no good now. Just another currupt politician. God help us.
April 20th, 2008
If she’s going to take credit for the successes of her husband’s administration, she’s stuck with the discredit for its errors.
And now she sounds like the neo-cons in advocating total U.S. military involvement in the Middle East.
May 10th, 2008
Hi!
Thanks for this thorough piece on the Clintons & Monsanto. Angry doesn’t begin to touch on the emotions we should feel over this.
May 12th, 2008
Interesting article to say the least. However, I’ve been doing my own research on the subject as I am a farmer and I would like to recommend the video “The world According to Monsanto”. After watching the video and reading this acticle, I question which president should be getting the blame. If I’m not mistaken it was G. H. Bush that helped pave the way for Monsanto.
May 15th, 2008
Linn:
Thank you for this. This is a well researched article (open letter).
You gave me additional reasons for not supporting her.
The Clintons are just bad for America.
May 16th, 2008
Want to do something simple, though it’s just a start?Find out if your local market carries Tyson products. Get a group of your friends together and have them write a letter to the CEO of the company, telling them you are getting together a campaign to have consumers boycott their stores if Tyson products are not removed from the shelves.
The culprit in this whole sad scenario is Bill Clinton. He was the boss and the buck stopped with him. But the bigger culprit is that money rules the roost Monsanto and Tyson and WalMart ponied up the big cash to Bill’s campaigns and he, to the detriment of us all, greased the skids for them
May 16th, 2008
Wonder if the mainstream media will pick up on this?? Not much hope — they’ve dropped the ball on investigative journalism in favour of “entertainment” which sells.
May 16th, 2008
Good work . This is only more confirmation that Clinton ( both of them ) are corporate , lobbyist and special interest loving frauds which has by now become obvious , just taking into account Clinton’s NAFTA , it’s a no brainer . Look into her associations , any one and every one who might help her in her power grab . Look at Hillary’s back ground , if she isn’t corporate who is ? My God ! She actually defends lobbyists and taking lobbyist money , ” lobbyists are people too ” she said in one of the debates ! She mocked Obama saying he was naive about changing things in Washington , in other words ” vote for me and I guarantee you things will not change ” and on that account she would be right . People basing their vote on gender or race need their heads examined , seriously ! USE YOUR BRAIN , STOP AND THINK , PLEASE !
May 17th, 2008
Wow!
I knew there was a reason I started growing my own vegetables in my own back yard.
Thank you for such a well researched article.
May 17th, 2008
Control the food, water, and information and you control the world. Messing with the makeup of nature is opening Pandora’s Box.
Homo sapiens is the only species capable of changing the environment. All other species must adapt or succumb. Does Hillary eat GMO food?
May 17th, 2008
I only recently started drinking only 100% organic milk. I had no idea Monsanto was able to get milk carton labeling to not list rBGH.
Hillary and Bill are beyond chutzpah. That they can claim to be American patriots while filling their pockets with $10’s millions of corporate bribes is unbelievable chutzpah. At least we knew up front that the moronic scumbag Toxic Texan would ruin America. He made no claim to being honest and fair.
I will actively campaign against Hillary and make sure she does not get re-elected to the US Senate, let alone run again for President.
May 17th, 2008
As one who has been into nutrition and exercise pretty much all my life…..I have eaten organically for a long, long time; do not use chemical-based cleaners or other products, primarily a vegetarian, only eat organic meats occasionally; weigh the same as I did in high school 35 years ago (160)…..it amazes me how stupid most people are when it comes to the products they use. Do you just inherently trust companies such as Monsanto? A chemical company turning to the corporate takeover of agribusiness? Read a little, get a clue!
Hillary has been sucking at the tit of Monsanto for some time now. If you don’t think she will sell you and your children’t health out to the corporate handlers, you are a bigger fool than anyone figured. Except for Hillary.
May 17th, 2008
All of the apparent insanity shall make
perfect sense to you if you read and study
my below essays:
Planned Destruction of America
http://planneddestructionofamerica.blogspot.com/
Corporate America: What Went Wrong?
http://corporateamericawhatwentwrong.blogspot.com/
The NAFTA Debacle
http://naftadebacle1.blogspot.com/